Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 17;15(12):e0243704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243704

Table 3. Comparison of measurement invariance models between Wave 1 (n = 888) and Wave 2 (n = 966).

Invariance models SCS CSBC CAS
χ2 df RMSEA [90% CI] CFI ΔCFI ΔRMSEA χ2 df RMSEA [90% CI] CFI ΔCFI ΔRMSEA χ2 df RMSEA [90% CI] CFI ΔCFI ΔRMSEA
Equal structure 19.808 4 0.065 [0.038, 0.095] .993 125.509 22 .071 [.058, .084] .964 27.844 4 .080 [.054, .11] .981
Equal loadings 40.262 7 .072 [.051, .094] .985 .008 .007 130.280 26 .066 [.055, .077] .964 0 .005 44.282 7 .076 [.055, .098] .971 .010 .004
Equal intercepts 95.810 10 .096 [.079, .114] .960 .025 .024 342.959 30 .106 [.096, .116] .892 .072 .040 197.431 10 .142 [.125, .160] .852 .119 .066
Partially equal intercepts a 43.765b 9 .065 [.046, .084] .984 .001 .007 135.786 c 28 .064 [.054, .076] .963 .001 .002 47.220 d 8 .073 [.053, .093] .969 .002 .003

Note. All models are compared to the model above them in the table, except a, which is compared to the model with equal loadings. Invariant intercepts: b Items 2 & 3, c Items 1, 4, 7 & 11, d Items 2. SCS = Short Cyberchondria Scale; CSBC = COVID-19 Safety Behaviour Checklist; CAS = COVID-19 Anxiety Scale; SB = Satorra-Bentler; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CI = confidence interval; CFI = comparative fit index. The internal consistency of all scales, expressed by McDonald’s omega and Cronbach alpha coefficients, is presented in Table 4. For most scales, the reliability was lower on the second wave (i.e. Sample 2), especially for Protection Behaviour in the COVID-19 Safety Behaviour Checklist.