Table 3. Comparison of measurement invariance models between Wave 1 (n = 888) and Wave 2 (n = 966).
Invariance models | SCS | CSBC | CAS | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
χ2 | df | RMSEA [90% CI] | CFI | ΔCFI ΔRMSEA | χ2 | df | RMSEA [90% CI] | CFI | ΔCFI ΔRMSEA | χ2 | df | RMSEA [90% CI] | CFI | ΔCFI ΔRMSEA | |
Equal structure | 19.808 | 4 | 0.065 [0.038, 0.095] | .993 | 125.509 | 22 | .071 [.058, .084] | .964 | 27.844 | 4 | .080 [.054, .11] | .981 | |||
Equal loadings | 40.262 | 7 | .072 [.051, .094] | .985 | .008 .007 | 130.280 | 26 | .066 [.055, .077] | .964 | 0 .005 | 44.282 | 7 | .076 [.055, .098] | .971 | .010 .004 |
Equal intercepts | 95.810 | 10 | .096 [.079, .114] | .960 | .025 .024 | 342.959 | 30 | .106 [.096, .116] | .892 | .072 .040 | 197.431 | 10 | .142 [.125, .160] | .852 | .119 .066 |
Partially equal intercepts a | 43.765b | 9 | .065 [.046, .084] | .984 | .001 .007 | 135.786 c | 28 | .064 [.054, .076] | .963 | .001 .002 | 47.220 d | 8 | .073 [.053, .093] | .969 | .002 .003 |
Note. All models are compared to the model above them in the table, except a, which is compared to the model with equal loadings. Invariant intercepts: b Items 2 & 3, c Items 1, 4, 7 & 11, d Items 2. SCS = Short Cyberchondria Scale; CSBC = COVID-19 Safety Behaviour Checklist; CAS = COVID-19 Anxiety Scale; SB = Satorra-Bentler; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CI = confidence interval; CFI = comparative fit index. The internal consistency of all scales, expressed by McDonald’s omega and Cronbach alpha coefficients, is presented in Table 4. For most scales, the reliability was lower on the second wave (i.e. Sample 2), especially for Protection Behaviour in the COVID-19 Safety Behaviour Checklist.