Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 17;15(12):e0242878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242878

Table 4. Performance of the DL, RF and GLM models and backcasting of the LEMA 0–8, EMA 8–24, EMA 24–48, and EMA 48–72 datasets.

AUC (95% CI) Specificity Sensitivity Accuracy
DL-LEMA 0–8 0.982(0.973–0.991) 0.947 0.935 0.945
RF-LEMA 0–8 0.968(0.953–0.983) 0.938 0.921 0.936
GLM-LEMA 0–8 0.966(0.95–0.981) 0.939 0.907 0.934
DL-EMA 8–24 0.894(0.868–0.914) 0.840 0.805 0.815
RF-EMA 8–24 0.872(0.846–0.898) 0.852 0.781 0.838
GLM-EMA 8–24 0.874(0.848–0.90) 0.863 0.771 0.844
DL-EMA 8–24 Backcasting 0.898(0.875–0.921) 0.827 0.832 0.828
RF-EMA 8–24 Backcasting 0.888(0.862–0.913) 0.859 0.808 0.849
GLM-EMA 8–24 Backcasting 0.874(0.847–0.848) 0.856 0.771 0.838
DL-EMA 24–48 0.873(0.840–0.907) 0.821 0.767 0.811
RF-EMA 24–48 0.897(0.926–0.926) 0.845 0.797 0.836
GLM-EMA 24–48 0.873(0.838–0.908) 0.813 0.827 0.815
DL-EMA 24–48 Backcasting 0.892(0.867–0.928) 0.838 0.839 0.838
RF-EMA 24–48 Backcasting 0.896(0.865–0.928) 0.870 0.821 0.860
GLM-EMA 24–48 Backcasting 0.862(0.825–0.899) 0.827 0.785 0.819
DL-EMA 48–72 0.846(0.812–0.902) 0.797 0.757 0.792
RF-EMA 48–72 0.841(0.807–0.875) 0.814 0.733 0.804
GLM-EMA 48–72 0.839(0.803–0.875) 0.758 0.787 0.762
DL-EMA 48–72 Backcasting 0.871(0.841–0.902) 0.820 0.787 0.816
RF-EMA 48–72 Backcasting 0.850(0.814–0.887) 0.849 0.751 0.836
GLM-EMA 48–72 Backcasting 0.818(0.78–0.857) 0.764 0.727 0.759