Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 16;12(22):22814–22839. doi: 10.18632/aging.103949

Table 2. The results of univariate Cox analysis.

Gene HR z 95%CI p value
SLCO4C1 0.8560 -2.9084 0.86 [0.77, 0.95] 0.0036
ZNF556 1.1087 2.8937 1.11 [1.03, 1.19] 0.0038
MAGEA1 1.1157 2.7109 1.12 [1.03, 1.21] 0.0067
AFAP1.AS1 1.0764 2.6837 1.08 [1.02, 1.14] 0.0073
CILP2 1.1273 2.6260 1.13 [1.03, 1.23] 0.0086
NAT2 0.8921 -2.5460 0.89 [0.82, 0.97] 0.0109
REP15 0.8971 -2.4593 0.90 [0.82, 0.98] 0.0139
POU4F1 1.1202 2.4028 1.12 [1.02, 1.23] 0.0163
EPHX4 0.8765 -2.2504 0.88 [0.78, 0.98] 0.0244
MIOX 1.1170 2.1943 1.12 [1.01, 1.23] 0.0282
SUSD5 1.1184 2.1421 1.12 [1.01, 1.24] 0.0322
RSPO4 1.0843 2.1218 1.08 [1.01, 1.17] 0.0339
IZUMO2 0.9140 -2.1136 0.91 [0.84, 0.99] 0.0346
NOVA1 1.1012 2.0521 1.10 [1.00, 1.21] 0.0402
EPHX3 1.1272 2.0510 1.13 [1.01, 1.26] 0.0403
AXIN2 0.8946 -2.0120 0.89 [0.80, 1.00] 0.0442
PPP1R14A 1.1511 1.9970 1.15 [1.00, 1.32] 0.0458
LY6E 1.1462 1.9954 1.15 [1.00, 1.31] 0.0460