Table 5.
Features that should alert investigators to a potentially poor fitting latent class analysis models and their corresponding trouble-shooting solutions to improve model fit.
Features suggesting poor fitting models | Trouble-shooting |
---|---|
Failure to obtain multiple replications of maximum likelihood | - Increase the number of random starts - Check the scale of the continuous predictor variables are appropriately transformed and uniformly scaled - Check distribution of variables and seek extreme outliers - If models fail to replicate the maximum likelihood consider rejecting the model |
Minor perturbation of indicators leading to large changes in the model fit statistics and/or VLMR values | - Check correlation between indicators - Check correlation between indicators within each class - Check if the data transformation/imputation of the continuous indicators has led to extreme scaling of important variables (see Figure 3) |
A two class model comprising of a class with less than 15% of the sample or Models comprising three or more classes contain a class(es) with less than 10% of the sample |
- Check to ensure that a single indicator is not the pre-dominant determinant of the classes - If a single variable determines the class: - Check the scale of the continuous predictor variables are appropriately transformed and scaled - Consider rejecting the model - Validate the findings in an independent cohort |
Models with low entropy | - Assess the quality of the indicators: - Examine the entropy of individual indicators. The variables may be of insufficient quality to separate the classes - Consider adding novel, higher quality, indicators to the model |
Note: the presented solutions may be helpful in rectifying poor model fit, when interpreting these features, however, it must always be considered that a given population may not have underlying latent classes.