TABLE 3.
Association of the IRG signature with clinical characteristics in CRC patients.
| Variables |
TCGA |
P |
GSE39582 |
P |
GSE17538 |
P | |||
| Low risk | High risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | High risk | ||||
| Age (years) | 0.3 | 0.46 | 0.58 | ||||||
| Unknown | 1 | ||||||||
| ≤68 | 115 | 128 | 150 | 161 | 62 | 66 | |||
| >68 | 128 | 116 | 138 | 129 | 51 | 45 | |||
| Gender | 0.06 | 0.96 | 0.78 | ||||||
| Female | 125 | 104 | 129 | 131 | 55 | 51 | |||
| Male | 118 | 140 | 160 | 159 | 58 | 60 | |||
| Tumor stage | <0.001*** | <0.001*** | 0.27 | ||||||
| Unknown | 3 | 9 | 3 | 1 | |||||
| Stage I | 60 | 20 | 27 | 10 | 16 | 11 | |||
| Stage II | 112 | 81 | 152 | 117 | 40 | 30 | |||
| Stage III | 55 | 78 | 85 | 124 | 35 | 40 | |||
| Stage IV | 13 | 56 | 22 | 38 | 22 | 30 | |||
| Pathologic T | <0.001*** | <0.001*** | |||||||
| Unknown | 1 | 5 | 18 | ||||||
| T1 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 5 | |||||
| T2 | 59 | 24 | 31 | 17 | |||||
| T3 | 157 | 177 | 198 | 178 | |||||
| T4 | 18 | 40 | 47 | 72 | |||||
| Pathologic N | <0.001*** | <0.001*** | |||||||
| Unknown | 7 | 25 | |||||||
| N0 | 177 | 114 | 184 | 127 | |||||
| N1 | 48 | 63 | 62 | 74 | |||||
| N2 | 18 | 67 | 36 | 64 | |||||
| Pathologic M | <0.001*** | <0.001*** | |||||||
| Unknown | 26 | 37 | 3 | 19 | |||||
| M0 | 204 | 151 | 263 | 233 | |||||
| M1 | 13 | 56 | 23 | 38 | |||||
The links between clinical factors and the IRG signature were investigated. The patients were divided into low- and high-risk groups according to median risk factor. Age and sex were verified via χ2-test, while tumors’ T, N, and M stages were checked by the rank-sum test. Tumor pathological state and disease stage were significantly correlated with the IRG signature. IRG, Immune-related gene; CRC, Colorectal Cancer. *** P < 0.001.