Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 12;6(6):735–740. doi: 10.1002/osp4.442

TABLE 4.

Participant characteristics associated with overall change profile in weight gain protective behaviours (higher scores indicate worsening)

Association with total score
Gender β = .016, p = .687
Age β = .052, p = .190
Ethnicity β = .061, p = .112
Education β = .002, p = .955
Household income β = .048, p = .218
High risk condition β = −.010, p = .804
Living alone β = .068, p = .075
Psychiatric condition β = .095, p = .014*
COVID diagnosis β = −.007, p = .859
Underweight (BMI < 18.5) β = − .011, p = .770
Overweight (BMI 18.5–24.9) β = .037, p = .361
Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) β = .084, p = .042 *
Model fit

F(12,710) = 2.068, p = .017

Adj. R 2 = .017

Multicollinearity VIFs >1.03 < 1.27

Note: Total score is sum across all five behaviours (reverse scoring: eaten healthily, exercised and slept) to create an index of overall change, with higher scores indicative of worsening of weight gain protective behaviours. Values are standardized coefficients. Gender reference category = female (vs. male), ethnicity reference category = not White (vs. White), education is highest level of qualification with reference category = less than degree level (vs. degree level or higher), household income is in £1000/year after tax, high risk condition reference category = no condition (vs. one or more high risk conditions), living alone reference category = not alone (vs. alone), psychiatric condition reference category = no condition (vs. previous diagnosis), COVID diagnosis reference category = no diagnosis (vs. formally diagnosed or suspected).

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

*

Significant at p < .05.