Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 17;3:782. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01504-0

Table 1.

In vitro pharmacology of PAR2 antagonists.

Compounds Ca2+ flux (hPAR2) Ca2+ flux (rPAR2) IP1 (hPAR2) pERK1/2 (hPAR2) β-arrestin (hPAR2) Competition Binding (hPAR2)
AZ8935 7.7 ± 0.1 (n = 3) 8.1 ± 0.1 (n = 4) 6.52 ± 0.04 (n = 6) 5.9 ± 0.1 (n = 3) 6.42 ± 0.03 (n = 3) nd
AZ3451 8.6 ± 0.1 (n = 30) 8.5 ± 0.1 (n = 12) 7.65 ± 0.02 (n = 122) 6.44 ± 0.03 (n = 3) 7.06 ± 0.04 (n = 3) 6.9 ± 0.2 (n = 4)
AZ2623 8.3 ± 0.1 (n = 26) 8.3 ± 0.1 (n = 12) 7.09 ± 0.02 (n = 106) 6.1 ± 0.1 (n = 3) 6.31 ± 0.04 (n = 3) 7.1 ± 0.3 (n = 3)
AZ7126 8.1 ± 0.2 (n = 4) 8.3 ± 0.2 (n = 4) 7.1 ± 0.1 (n = 6) 6.7 ± 0.1 (n = 3) 7.2 ± 0.1 (n = 3) nd
AZ8838 5.70 ± 0.02 (n = 33) 5.3 ± 0.1 (n = 15) 5.84 ± 0.02 (n = 158) 5.7 ± 0.1 (n = 3) 6.1 ± 0.1 (n = 3) 5.2 ± 0.1 (n = 3)
AZ0107 6.1 ± 0.1 (n = 3) 5.5 ± 0.1 (n = 4) 6.7 ± 0.1 (n = 12) 5.9 ± 0.1 (n = 3) 6.3 ± 0.1 (n = 3) 5.4 ± 0.2 (n = 3)

In functional assays, PAR2 was activated with peptide, SLIGRL-NH2 in 1321N1-hPAR2 cells (Ca2+ and IP1) or U2OS-hPAR2 (pERK1/2 and β-arrestin-2). Species differences were considered through monitoring Ca2+ release by rat PAR2 in KNRK cells. Binding was measured in competition experiments against Eu-tagged-2f-LIGRLO(dtpa)-NH2 on CHO-hPAR2 cells. Data are presented as mean pKi (binding only) or pIC50 ± s.e.m. based on n independent experiments.

nd Not determined.