Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2021 Jan;28(1):17–23. doi: 10.1101/lm.052100.120

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2021 Sato et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://learnmem.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 4. — Effect of context switch on relative odor preference of crickets that received extended training and were not given water (A) or were given water until satiation (B) before being tested. (A) Relative preference for peppermint odor shown by two groups of crickets that received extended (four-trial × 3 d) training under illumination and that were tested under illumination (extended-same group) or in the dark (extended-different group). Relative preference for peppermint odor shown by another group that received both extended (four-trial × 3 d) unpaired training and testing under illumination (extended-unpaired group). None of the crickets were given water before the test was conducted. (B) Relative preference for peppermint odor shown by two groups that received extended training under illumination and were given water until satiation before the test, which was conducted under illumination (extended-same group) or in the dark (extended-different group). Relative preference for peppermint odor shown by another group that received extended unpaired training under illumination and water satiation before the test was conducted also under illumination (extended-unpaired group). The relative odor preferences are shown as PIs for the conditioned odor. The top trace in each figure indicates the schedule of the training and the test. Statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks. M–W test, Holm's method, (NS) P > 0.05, (*) P < 0.05, (***) P < 0.001. The sample size is shown at each graph.