Table 2. Agreement rate of judges and content validity index (CVI) in the tool’s analysis. São Paulo City, São Paulo State, Brazil, 2020.
Item | Delphi 1 | Delphi 2 | Delphi 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agreement (%) | CVI | Agreement (%) | CVI | Agreement (%) | CVI | ||
I-1 | Relevance | 100 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
Clarity | 90 | 0.97 | 88 | 0.95 | 100 | 1 | |
I-2 | Relevance | 100 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
Clarity | 90 | 0.97 | 88 | 0.95 | 100 | 1 | |
I-3 | Relevance | 80 | 0.93 | 75 | 0.91 | 88 | 0.95 |
Clarity | 40 | 0.77 | 38 | 0.75 | 88 | 0.95 | |
I-4 | Relevance | 100 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
Clarity | 90 | 0.97 | 88 | 0.95 | 100 | 1 | |
Final classification | 100 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 1 | |
Score of items | 90 | 0.97 | 100 | 1 | 88 | 0.95 |
Source: elaborated by the authors. CVI: content validity index.