Table 1. Experimental evidence of Bliss synergy.
Infection | Cell line | Drug combination | fu(DT) | fu(DC) | fu(DT,DC) | βBliss | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Expected | Observed | |||||||
SARS-2-S | Vero-TMPRSS2 | Camostat (DT) + E-64d (DC) |
0.43 | 0.79 | 0.34 | 0.08 | 0.26 | [21] |
SARS-S | Vero-TMPRSS2 | Camostat (DT) + E-64d (DC) |
0.53 | 0.8 | 0.42 | 0.02 | 0.4 | [21] |
SARS-S | HeLa-ACE2-TMPRSS2 | Camostat (DT) + EST (DC) |
0.42 | 0.66 | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.22 | [28] |
SARS-S | HeLa-ACE2-TMPRSS2 | Camostat (DT) + Bafilomycin (DC) |
0.42 | 0.6 | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.17 | [28] |
*Note that synergy is not expected in cell lines such as Calu-3 and Caco-2 where one pathway dominates (see Fig 6).