Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Dec 18;15(12):e0244272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244272

Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Clinique Ngaliema, a public hospital in Kinshasa, in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A retrospective cohort study

Junior Rika Matangila 1,2,*, Ritha Kibambe Nyembu 1,3, Gloire Mosala Telo 1, Christian Djuba Ngoy 1, Taty Msueun Sakobo 1, Joel Mbembo Massolo 1, Blandine Mbo Muyembe 1, Richard Kapela Mvwala 1, Cedric Kabemba Ilunga 1,4, Emmanuel Bakilo Limbole 1, Jeff Mukengeshay Ntalaja 1, Roger Minga Kongo 1
Editor: Raffaele Serra5
PMCID: PMC7748279  PMID: 33338063

Abstract

Objectives

To describe the clinical characteristics of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 at Clinique Ngaliema, a public hospital, in Kinshasa, in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed medical records including socio-demographics, past medical history, clinical manifestation, comorbidities, laboratory data, treatment and disease outcome of 160 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, with confirmed result of SARS-CoV-2 viral infection.

Results

The median age of patients was 54 years (IQR: 38–64), and there was no significant gender difference (51% of male). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (55 [34%]), diabetes (31 [19%]) and obesity (13 [8%]). Fever (93 [58%]), cough (92 [57%]), fatigue (87 [54%]), shortness of breath (72 [45%]) and myalgia (33 [21%]) were the most common symptoms, upon admission. Patients were categorized into mild (92 [57%]), moderate (19 [12%]) and severe (49 [31%]). Severe patients were older and were more likely to have comorbidities, compared to mild ones. The majority of patients (92% [147 of 160]) patients received hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine phosphate. Regression model revealed that older age, lower SpO2, higher heart rate and elevated AST at admission were all risk factors associated with in-hospital death. The prevalence of COVID-19 and malaria co-infection was 0.63% and 70 (44%) of all patients received antimalarial treatment before hospitalization.

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that the epidemiological and clinical feature of COVID-19 patients in Kinshasa are broadly similar to previous reports from other settings. Older age, lower SpO2, tachycardia, and elevated AST could help to identify patients at higher risk of death at an early stage of the illness. Plasmodium spp co-infection was not common in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Introduction

The novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 or 2019-nCoV (COVID-19), was first reported in a cluster of patients with pneumonia, in the Chinese city of Wuhan on 31 December 2019 [1]. Since then, the fast spread of the virus has resulted in a global pandemic that the WHO declared on 11th March 2020 [2]. At the beginning of the outbreak, China was the most affected country worldwide, from where the epidemic spread rapidly in Europe and America, with the USA being nowadays the most affected country. The Africa continent as well is affected by COVID-19, where many countries have weaker health systems and overall poorer responses to the virus. In this part of the planet, COVID-19 was expected to have higher attack and mortality rates [3].

While an increasing number of publications have brought significant insight on the clinical characteristics of infected patients from Asia [4, 5], Europe [6, 7] and America [8], there is a paucity of data on the clinical features of COVID-19 in sub-Saharan African population. In-fact recent data have shown disparities by race (black vs white) [9], income and access to health care [10] in regard to COVID-19 related severity and death, suggesting that the epidemiology, the clinical presentation and the course of COVID-19 may vary from one setting to another. Moreover, considering that malaria and COVID-19 share a couple of symptoms, identifying and managing COVID-19 cases may become challenging in sub-Saharan region. This underlines the necessity to provide sufficient data on COVID-19 characteristics in sub-Saharan African population, in order to guide medical practitioners and decision makers acting in this region.

This study describes the epidemiological and clinical features, laboratory findings, treatment, and outcomes of COVID‐19 patients in one of the selected Hospital for COVID-19 care of Kinshasa, in DRC.

Materials and methods

Study design

This was a retrospective cohort study including patients of Clinique Ngaliema, one of the five public hospitals of Kinshasa province designated for COVID-19 patients care. The study included adult in-patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection. All patients were confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed by RT-PCR, performed at the National Institute of Bio-medical Research, according to WHO interim guidance [11].

Site organization

At the start of the epidemic, each of the 25 municipalities of Kinshasa was assigned to different hospitals selected for COVID-19 patients care and designated as COVID-19 treatment center (CTC).

Clinique Ngaliema, a national secondary referral public hospital, located in the municipality of Gombe, was assigned to provide care to COVID-19 patients coming from six municipalities of Kinshasa, including: Gombe, (the municipality currently bearing the highest number of COVID-19 cases), Kintambo, Kinshasa, Lingwala, Barumbu and Ngaliema. These six municipalities represent the catchment area of the Clinique Ngaliema, as a CTC.

Clinique Ngaliema has dedicated a building with a capacity of 27 patients (with possibility to extend to 45 patients) for COVID-19 care and a staff of 107 health professionals. Suspected COVID-19 patients are transferred to the dedicated COVID-19 building, where throat and nasopharyngeal swabs are immediately collected and sent to the National Institute of Biomedical research for RT-PCR analyses.

Data collection

The following data were collected from patient medical records: demographic information, medical history, exposure history, clinical signs, symptoms and comorbidities, date of symptoms onset, as well as their severity, laboratory examination results, treatment, and disease outcome (death or discharge).

In accordance with to the National guidelines for COVID-19 management in DRC [12], the patients were categorized into mild, moderate and severe clinical groups. The mild clinical group had mild clinical symptoms including: fever, respiratory rate (RR) between 12 and 20 breaths/minute, mild respiratory tract symptoms (rhinorrhea, sore throat and cough), arthralgia, digestives symptoms (diarrhea and vomiting). The moderate clinical group presented: fever, RR between 20 and 30 breaths/ minute, oxygen saturation (SpO2) between 90 and 95%. The severe clinical group presented fever (T°≥ 38.5°C), severe respiratory distress, dyspnea, RR ≥ 30 breaths/minute, an oxygen saturation of <90%, Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and septic shock.

Laboratory examination results included: the hemoglobin rate, numbers of leukocytes, percentages of lymphocytes and neutrophils, number of platelets, D-dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), urea, creatinine, glycaemia, and thick blood smear (TBS) for malaria diagnosis.

Data analysis

Data were entered and stored in Microsoft Excel 2016. Frequencies, rates and percentages were used to summarize categorical variables, whose proportions were compared using a X2 or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were described using the median with interquartile range(IQR). Differences in median values were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test. Values of p less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify factors associated with severity of symptoms, in-hospital death and those associated with unnecessary antimalarial drugs administration. Statistical analyses were done using SPSS statistical program, version 24 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Ethical considerations

The investigators agreed to conduct the present study in full agreement with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki’ and its subsequent relevant amendments. The study was approved by the institutional ethics board of the Clinique Ngaliema. The access to patient medical records was granted by the director of the hospital. All data were fully anonymized before they have been accessed. Patients whose medical records were selected for analysis sought treatment from march to July 2020 and their data were accessed from Jun to July 2020.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics and seeking care behavior

Between Mars 11th to July 22th 2020, a total of 160 patients with COVID-19 confirmed infection admitted at Clinique Ngaliema Hospital, and complete data for all variables of interest, were included. The median age of all patients was 54 years (IQR:38–64) (Table 1). The sex ratio was 1.1, with 51% of male (82 cases). The median time from illness onset to hospitalization at Clinique Ngaliema was 7 days (IQR:5–10). Female attended hospital earlier than male (5 days IQR: [47] vs 7 days [IQR: 6–11]; p = 0.003, respectively) (Fig 1). Out of all patients admitted, 42 (26%) were transferred from non-CTC health facilities. Eighty-three (52%) cases were located within the Clinique Ngaliema catchment area (Table 1), with Ngaliema municipality having the highest number of cases (51%) (Fig 2). Sixty-eight (43%) patients had an history of exposure to a COVID-19 confirmed or suspected case and most of them (51 cases), were in the mild group (Table 1). In addition, patients with clear history of exposure to COVID case were more likely to attend Clinique Ngaliema as a CTC, earlier (5 days [IQR: 3–7] from the onset of symptoms) compared to those with unclear history of exposure (7 days [IQR: 5–8]; p = 0.034) (Fig 3).

Table 1. Demographic and baseline characteristics of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

All patients (N = 160) Mild (n = 92) Moderate (n = 19) P value (Moderate vs Mild) Severe (n = 49) P value (severe vs Mild) P value (Severe vs Moderate)
Variables
Age (year) 54 (38–64) 51 (35–61) 50 (38–66) 0.52 58 (50–70) 0.001* 0.081
Sex - - - 0.52 - 0.035* 0.425
    Male 82 (51%) 41 (45%) 10 (53%) - 31 (63%) - -
    Female 78 (49%) 51 (55%) 9 (47%) - 18 (37%) - -
Exposure history
    Contact with suspected or confirmed COVID 19 cases 68 (43%) 51 (55%) 7 (37%) 0.155 10 (20%) 0.001* 0.273
    No clear contact history 7 (4%) 4 (4%) 0 - 3 (6%) - -
    History of recent travel outside DRC 5 (3%) 3 (3%) 0 - 2 (4%) - -
Comorbidities
    Any 74 (46%) 31 (33%) 11 (58%) 0.048* 32 (65%) 0.0003* 0.572
    Hypertension 55 (34%) 24 (26%) 10 (53%) 0.023* 21 (43%) 0.043* 0.471
    Diabetes 31 (19%) 14 (15%) 5 (26%) 0.244 12 (24%) 0.178 0.877
    Obesity 13 (8%) 7 (8%) 2 (11%) - 4 (8%) - -
    Heart disease 11 (7%) 2 (2%) 2 (11%) - 7 (14%) - -
    Asthma / chronic pulmonary disease 5 (3%) 1(1%) 1 (5%) - 3 (6%) - -
Time before seeking care (day) 7 (5–10) 5 (4–7) 7 (4.5–8.5) 0.817 7 (6.5–10) 0.003 * 0.074
Therapeutic itinerary - - - 0.006* <0.0001 0.589
    Transferred from non-CTC hospitals 42 (26%) 11 (12%) 8 (42%) - 23 (47%) - -
    Attended Cl.Ng. from home 118 (74%) 81 (88%) 11 (58%) - 26 (53%) - -
    Within Cl.Ng. Coachtment area 83 (52%) 47 (51%) 9 (47%) 0.768 27 (55%) 0.651 0.569
    Self-reporting Antimalarial treatment before hospitalization 70 (44%) 27 (29%) 12 (63%) 0.043* 31 (64%) 0.0003* 0.576

Data are n (%) or median (IQR), Cl.Ng.: Clinique Ngaliema CTC: COVID-19 treatment center, COVID 19: Coronavirus disease 2019.

Fig 1. Sex and time interval from onset of symptoms to hospitalization.

Fig 1

Fig 2. Distribution of COVID-19 patients according to their location in the province of Kinshasa.

Fig 2

Municipalities within Clinique Ngaliema catchment area are presented in blue and others in grey.

Fig 3. History of exposure to a confirmed or suspected COVID-19 case and time interval from onset of symptoms to hospitalization.

Fig 3

Past medical history

Comorbidities were reported among 74 (46%) patients and the most common included hypertension and diabetes. Severe patients were more likely to have comorbidities compared to mild ones (65% vs 33%; p = 0.0003) (Table 1).

Initial clinical presentation

Patients were clinically categorized into three groups: mild (92 [57%] cases), moderate (19 [12%] cases) and severe (49 [31%] cases). Patients in the severe group were significantly older than those in the mild group (median age 58 years [IQR: 50–70] vs 51 years [IQR: 35–61], p = 0.001) (Table 1).

The most common symptoms reported upon admission were fever (93 [58%] cases), cough (92 [57%] cases), fatigue (87 [54%] cases), and shortness of breath (72 [45%] cases). Vital signs at admission, indicated that 56 (35%) patients had heart rate (HR) >100 beats/min, 18 (11%) presented RR ≥30 breaths/min, and 34 (21.4%) had SpO2 below 90% (Table 2). Female had significantly higher SpO2 compared to male (median SpO2 97% [IQR:88–99] vs 92% [IQR: 82–97]; p = 0.009) (Fig 4). At baseline, QTc interval prolongation was found in 8 (5%) patients (Table 2).

Table 2. Symptoms, vital signs and outcomes of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

All patients (N = 160) Mild (n = 92) Moderate (n = 19) P value (Moderate vs Mild) Severe (n = 49) P value (severe vs Mild) P value (Severe vs Moderate)
Variables
Self-reported symptoms
    Fever 93 (58%) 39 (42%) 14 (74%) 0.013* 40 (82%) <0.0001* 0.470
    Cough 92 (57%) 45 (49%) 13 (68%) 0.041* 34 (69%) 0.007* 0.854
    Fatigue 87 (54%) 34 (37%) 12 (63%) 0.036* 41 (84%) <0.0001* 0.069
    Shortness of breath 72 (45%) 13 (14%) 16 (84%) <0.0001* 43 (88%) <0.0001* 0.701
    Myalgia or arthralgia 33 (21%) 17 (18%) 1 (5%) - 15 (31%) - -
    Sore throat 18 (11%) 9 (10%) 3 (18%) - 6 (12%) - -
    Rhinorrhea 16 (10%) 8 (9%) 2 (11%) - 6 (12%) - -
    Vomiting 12 (8%) 3 (3%) 3 (16%) - 6 (12%) - -
    Diarrhea 11 (7%) 3 (3%) 2 (11%) - 6 (12%) - -
    Headache 7 (4%) 6 (7%) 1 (5%) - 0 - -
    Loss of appetite 5 (3%) 1 (1%) 0 - 4 (8%) - -
    Olfactory disorders 2 (1%) 2 (2%) 0 - 0 - -
Vital signs upon admission
    Respiratory rate     (RR)_breaths/min 22 (20–26) 22 (20–22) 24 (22–28) 0.0006* 27 (26–30) <0.0001* 0.021*
    Dyspnea (RR ≥ 30 breaths/ minute) 18 (11%) 5 (5%) 3 (16%) - 10 (20%) <0.0001* 0.004*
    Temperatures _ °C 36.8 (36.5–37.4) 36.6 (36.4–36.9) 37.3 (36.8–38.3) 0.02* 37.8 (36.5–38.3) 0.025* 0.080
    Temperature ≥ 38°C 62 (39%) 34 (37%) 9 (47%) 0.243 19 (39%) 0.203 0.698
    SpO2 _% 96 (86–98) 98 (96–99) 91 (90–97) <0.0001* 80 (62–87) <0.0001* <0.0001*
    SpO2 < 95% 58 (36%) 5 (5%) 12 (63%) <0.0001* 41 (84%) <0.0001* 0.112
    Heart rate (HR) _beats/min 89 (84–104) 85 (80–92) 88 (85–112) 0.042* 103 (95–116) <0.0001* 0.143
    HR>100 beats/min 56 (35%) 13 (14%) 8 (41%) 0.012* 35 (71%) <0.0001* 0.115
    Systolic blood pressure (SBP)_mmHg 120 (110–135) 120 (110–130) 130 (120–140) 0.013* 130 (110–140) 0.085 0.521
    SBP <90 mmHg 3 (2%) 1(1%) 0 - 2 (4%) - -
    ECG QTc _ms 432 (407–458) 424 (404–445) 497 (434–507) - 441 (411–454) - -
ECG QTc ≥ 500 ms 8 (5%) 1 (1.1%) 4 (21%) - 3 (6%) - -
Treatment
    Hydroxychloroquine- Azithromycin 147 (92%) 88 (96%) 17 (89%) 0.280 42 (86%) 0.048* 0.683
    Oxygen support 81 (51%) 17 (18%) 17 (89%) <0.0001* 47 (96%) <0.0001* 0.325
    Antibiotic therapy 90 (56%) 33 (36%) 14 (74%) 0.003* 43 (87%) <0.0001* 0.184
    Dexamethasone 5 (3%) - - - 5 (3%) - -
    Invasive ventilation 4 (2.5%) - - - 4 (8.2%) - -
Clinical evolution
    Hospitalization duration 15 (4–20) 16 (13–21) 19 (9–23) 0.731 3.5 (1–15) <0.0001* 0.0002*
Outcome - - - 0.11 - <0.0001* 0.008*
    Discharge 128 (80%) 87 (95%) 16 (84%) - 25 (51%) - -
    Death 32 (20%) 5 (5%) 3 (16%) - 24 (49%) - -

Data are n (%) or median (IQR), SpO2: Peripheral oxygen saturation, SBP: Systolic blood pressure, ECG QTc: Electrocardiogram Corrected QT interval.

Fig 4. Sex and peripheral oxygen saturation.

Fig 4

Hematology and inflammatory markers

Most patients (115 [72.1%] cases) had normal leukocyte count. Severe patients had significantly higher leukocyte count compared to mild and moderate patients. The median CRP concentration was 48 (IQR: 6–115) for all patients and CRP level was 2.5 times higher in severe patients than in mild patients (84 mg/L [IQR: 24–218] vs 34 [IQR: 2–95]; p = 0.001). The procalcitonin level was also elevated (> 0,5 μg/L) in most patients (118 [74%] cases), with no significant difference between clinical groups (Table 3).

Table 3. Laboratory findings on admission.

All patients (N = 160) Mild (n = 92) Moderate (n = 19) P value (Moderate vs Mild) Severe (n = 49) P value (severe vs Mild) P value (Severe vs Moderate)
Variables
Haemoglobin g/dL 12 (10–13) 12 (10–12) 12 (10–13) 0.823 12 (11–13) 0.459 0.872
White blood cell (WBC) count_ cells/ μL, median (IQR) 6200 (4600–9012) 5100 (4200–6900) 6300 (5400–10000) 0.012* 9600 (6800–14000) <0.0001* 0.175
    WBC count: - - - 0.653 <0.0001* 0.401
    < 4000 21 (13%) 16 (17%) 1 (6%) - 4 (9%) - -
    4000–12000 115 (72%) 74 (80%) 14 (75%) - 27 (56%) - -
    >12000 24 (15%) 3 (3%) 4 (19%) - 17 (35%) - -
Neutrophils _%, median (IQR) 66 (52–78) 56 (48–66) 72 (63–75) 0.020* 77 (70–85) 0.0001* 0.393
    Neutrophils_%: - - - 0.048* <0.0001* 0.701
    < 55% 50 (31%) 42 (45%) 3 (14%) - 5 (10%) - -
    55–70% 43 (27%) 29 (32%) 5 (29%) - 9 (18%) - -
    >70% 67 (42%) 21 (23%) 11 (57%) - 35 (71%) - -
Lymphocytes _%, median (IQR) 29 (18–41) 36 (26–44) 25 (17–31) 0.003* 20 (13–26) <0.0001* 0.259
    Lymphocytes_%: - - - 0.030* 0.0001* 0.250
    <20% 44 (28%) 14 (15%) 6 (32%) - 23 (47%) - -
    20–40% 73 (46%) 43 (47%) 12 (62%) - 19 (39%) - -
    >40% 43 (27%) 35 (38%) 1 (6%) - 7 (14%) - -
Platelet count _ cells per μL, median (IQR) 204,000 (127,000–285,000) 199,000 (133,500–281,012) 199,000 (117,000–314,000) 0.798 209,000 (126,000–311,000) 0.653 0.9872
    Platelet count: - - - 0.024* 0.132 0.332
    < 150,000 55 (34%) 29 (32%) 9 (47%) - 17 (34%) - -
    150,000–400,000 94 (59%) 60 (65%) 6 (31%) - 28 (57%) - -
    >400,000 11 (7%) 3 (3%) 4 (21%) - 4 (9%) - -
AST_IU/L, median (IQR) 69 (30–115) 55 (21–105) 69 (26–116) 0.531 92 (54–136) 0.005* 0.145
    AST >38 106 (66%) 55 (60%) 13 (68%) 0.416 38 (78%) 0.016* 0.363
ALT_IU/L, median (IQR) 37 (18–63) 32 (16–64) 44 (18–58) 0.802 39 (25–67) 0.338 0.822
ALT >45 60 (37%) 33 (36%) 9 (47%) 0.407 18 (36%) 0.721 0.597
CRP_ mg/L, median (IQR) 48 (6–115) 34 (2–95) 56 (12–96) 0.333 84 (24–218) 0.001* 0.186
PCT _ μg/L, median (IQR) 22 (0.42–55) 26 (0.2–54) 30 (0.17–67) 0.506 13 (1.3–60) 0.453 0.647
    PCT >0.5 118 (74%) 64 (70%) 13 (64%) 0.6 41 (84%) 0.082 0.083
D-dimer_ ng/mL, median (IQR) 2390 (613–5483) 1549 (406–5127) 4143 (919–6312) 0.157 3582 (1256–4814) 0.066 0.781
    D-dimer_mg/mL: - - - 0.343 - 0.005* 0.224
    <500 32 (20%) 28 (30%) 2 (13%) - 2 (5%) - -
    500–1000 21 (13%) 11 (12%) 4 (19%) - 6 (12%) - -
    >1000 107 (67%) 53 (58%) 13 (68%) - 41 (83%) - -
Urea_ mg/dL, median (IQR) 27 (17–45) 24 (16–38) 24 (22–38) 0.985 39 (18–75) 0.007* 0.055
    Urea >45 40 (25%) 16 (17%) 2 (12%) 0.213 22 (45%) 0.0008* 0.015*
Creatinine_ mg/L, median (IQR) 9 (7–13) 9 (7–12) 9 (8–12) 0.703 12 (7–17) 0.088 0.354
    Creatinine > 15 mg/L 15 (9%) 7 (8%) 0 - 8 (16%) 0.004* -
Glycaemia _g/dL 123 (90–220) 108 (86–181) 137 (99–245) 0.214 156 (104–225) 0.009* 0.748
Positive TBS 1(0.63%) 0 0 - 1 (2%) - -
    Malaria parasite density /μL 16,900 - - - - -

Data are n (%) or median (IQR), %: Proportion, ALT: Alanine aminotransferase, AST: Aspartate aminotransferase, CRP: C-reactive protein, PCT: Procalcitonin, TBS: Thick blood smear.

Coagulation function

The level of D-dimer was above 1000 ng/mL in 107 cases (67%) and no significant difference of D-dimer concentration was found between clinical groups (Table 3).

Liver function

Elevated concentration of AST (>38 IU/L) was observed in was 106 (66%) cases. Compared to mild patients, severe patients had significantly higher AST concentration (p = 0.005). Elevated ALT level (>45 IU/L) was found in 60 (37%) patients, with no significant difference between clinical groups (Table 3).

Renal function

The median urea level of all the patients was nearly in the normal range (27mg/dL [IQR 17–43]) (Normal range: 15–45 mg /L) and severe patients had higher urea concentration compared to mild ones (p<0.007). The creatinine concentration of all patients was equally nearly in the normal range (9 mg/L [IQR: 7–13]) (normal range: 5–15 mg/L) with no significant difference between clinical groups (Table 3).

COVID-19 treatment

Almost all patients (147 [92%]) received the combination of hydroxychloroquine (or chloroquine phosphate)—azithromycin (HCQ-AZ). Beside HCQ-AZ, patients also received antibiotic (90 [56%] cases) and corticosteroids (5 [3%] cases) as concomitant or adjuvant treatment, respectively. Many patients (81 [51%] cases) required oxygen support and most of them were in the severe group (Table 2). Invasive ventilation was used for very few patients (4 [2.5%] cases).

Factors affecting in-hospital death

Of all patients included in the study, 32 (20%) died during hospitalization and 128 (80%) were discharged. In univariate analysis, odds of in-hospital death was higher in patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (or chloroquine phosphate) plus Azithromycin, patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), higher RR, shortness of breath, elevated D-dimer and PCT or higher quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score. Age, comorbidity, fever, SpO2, neutrophil and lymphocyte rates, CRP, AST, urea and creatinine were also associated with death (Table 4). The regression model showed that older age, lower SpO2, higher heart rate and elevated AST at admission were independent risk factors associated with in-hospital death (Table 4).

Table 4. Factors associated with in-hospital death.

Variables Non-survivor (n = 33) Survivor (127) Univariate OR p value Multivariate OR P value
Age_years 59 (51–69) 52 (36–62) 1.04 (1.01–1.07) 0.006* 1.06 (1.0–1.11) 0.033*
Sex Male 17 (53%) 66 (52%) 1.06 (0.49–2.32) 0.881 - -
Female 16 (47%) 61 (48%) 1
Presence of Comorbidity Yes 23 (69%) 53 (42%) 3.06 (1.34–7.02) 0.008* - -
No 10 (31%) 74 (58%) 1
Hypertension Yes 15 (44%) 42 (33%) 1.59 (0.72–3.53) 0.249 - -
No 18 (56%) 85 (67%) 1
Diabetes Yes 9 (28%) 22 (17%) 1.88 (0.76–4.65) 0.168 - -
No 24 (72%) 105 (83%) 1
Obesity Yes 3 (9%) 9 (7%) 1.30 (0.33–5.11) 0.708 -
No 30 (91%) 118 (93%) 1
Heart disease Yes 4 (12%) 8 (6%) 2.35 (0.64–8.58) 0.197 - -
No 29 (88%) 119 (94%) 1
Respiratory rate_breaths/ min ≤24 8 (24%) 98 (77%) 10.71 (4.04–28.36) <0.0001* - -
>24 25 (76%) 29 (23%) 1
SpO2_%, median (IQR) 81 (62–87) 97 (91–99) 0.92 (0.89–0.96) <0.0001* 0.94 (0.90–0.98) 0.007*
Fever Yes 26 (78%) 67 (53%) 3.13 (1.26–7.78) 0.014* - -
No 7 (22%) 60 (47%) 1
Cough Yes 22 (67%) 70 (55%) 1.96 (0.83–4.58) 0.12 - -
No 11 (33%) 57 (45%) 1
qSOFA 1.0 (1.0–2.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 5.11 (2.21–11.85) 0.0001* 4.02 (0.84–19.22) 0.081
SIRS Yes 32 (96%) 77 (61%) 15.57 (2.03–119.27) 0.008* - -
No 1 (4%) 50 (39%) 1
Shortness of breath Yes 27 (81%) 48 (38%) 7.15 (2.74–18.68) 0.0001* - -
No 6 (19%) 79 (62%) 1
Hydroxychloroquine (or Chloroquine phosphate)- Azithromycin Yes 25 (75%) 122 (96%) 0.13 (0.04–0.43) 0.0008* 0.24 (0.03–2.2) 0.208
No (25%) 5 (4%) 1
Therapeutic itinerary Attended directly Cl.Ng. 19 (58%) 97 (76%) 2.24 (0.98–5.13) 0.056 - -
Transferred from non-CTC 14 (42%) 30 (24%) 1  
Heart rate_beats /min 111 (98–119) 88 (82–99) 1.07 (1.04–1.11) <0.0001* 1.06 (1.02–1.11) 0.027*
WBC counts_cells/μL, median (IQR) 8700 (6300–13300) 5800 (4500–8400) 1 (1–1) 0.105 - -
Neutrophils_%, median (IQR) 75 (69–85) 62 (50–75) 1.05 (1.02–1.09) 0.004* - -
Lymphocytes_%, median (IQR) 21 (15–28) 31 (19–42) 0.96 (0.93–0.99) 0.024*
PCT_ μg/L, median (IQR) <0.5 3 (8%) 41 (32%) 1
≥0.5 30 (92%) 86 (68%) 5.18 (1.16–23.26) 0.032* - -
CRP_ mg/L, median (IQR) 148 (27–319) 42 (0.5–96) 1.01 (1–1.01) 0.0002* - -
D-dimer_ mg/L <1000 3 (8%) 47 (37%) 1
≥1000 30 (92%) 80 (63%) 6.33 (1.41–28.42) 0.016* - -
ALT_UI/L 32 (15–59) 55 (29–77) 1.01 (0.99–1.02) 0.062 - -
AST_ UI/L 22 (60–102) 83 (128–159) 1.02 (1.01–1.03) <0.0001* 1.02 (1.01–1.03) 0.005*
Urea_ mg/dL 35 (20–73) 24 (17–42) 1.01 (1–1.03) 0.015*
Creatinine_ mg/dL ≤15 26 (79%) 119 (94%) 1
>15 7 (21%) 8 (6%) 3.95 (1.14–13.75) 0.031* - -

Data are n (%) or median (IQR), %: Proportion, ALT: Alanine aminotransferase, AST: Aspartate aminotransferase, CRP: C-reactive protein, PCT: Procalcitonin, SpO2: Peripheral oxygen saturation, qSOFA = Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, SIRS: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, OR: Odds ratio.

COVID-19 and malaria co-infection

Only one case (0.63%) of COVID-19 and malaria co-infection was observed. The parasite density was 16,900/μL (Table 3). Antimalarial treatment before hospitalization was reported by 70 (44%) cases and more than half (61%) of them were found in the moderate and severe groups (Table 1). Factors associated with antimalarial use are presented in the appendix (see web-only S1 Table).

Discussion

This retrospective study portrayed the clinical features of COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Clinique Ngaliema and living in Kinshasa, in the DRC.

The median age was found to be 54 years and severe patients were older than mild patients. Previous studies reported a broadly similar age distribution [13, 14]. Male and female were equally represented. Equal sex distribution was also reported by Suxin Wan et al [15], although many studies in contrast reported gender imbalance, with either higher male to female ratio [5, 16] or higher female to male ratio [4]. Interestingly, in line with other reports [17], it was noted that female were less likely to have severe symptoms compared to male. However, our results suggested that female seemed to be less affected by the infection because they attended hospital at its early stage, characterized by mild symptoms [18], compared to male who reached hospital at the progressive stage of the disease [18]. In addition, to support this observation, this study did not find any association between gender and in-hospital death.

Of all patients, 43% had a clear history of exposure to a confirmed or probable COVID-19 case. These patients were prone to visited directly from home a CTC, and at an earlier stage of the illness, compared to those with unclear history of exposure. These findings could suggest a higher level of awareness about COVID-19 existence and related symptoms in patients living in the city center of Kinshasa, who visited Clinique Ngaliema. Therefore, efforts should be invested in order to increase awareness in peri-urban areas of Kinshasa and in other provinces of DRC affected by COVID-19, where awareness on COVID-19 disease is expected to be lower.

Almost half of all patients (44%) reported having received antimalarial treatment before their hospitalization at the Clinique Ngaliema. However, it was unclear whether they have been diagnosed for malaria or they received antimalarial drugs on the basis of underlying fever or other malaria related symptoms. As malaria and COVID-19 share a couple of symptoms, a number of mild COVID-19 cases may go undetected and treated as Plasmodium spp infections. These findings underline the complexity of the of COVID-19 infection management in malaria endemic areas. Next to that, in line with other reports [14], more than half of patients received antibiotic therapy. These findings are a matter of great concern and underline the urgent need for strong guidelines in order to reduce and prevent antibiotic and antimalarial overuse during COVID-19 pandemic, in sub-Saharan Africa.

Comorbidity was reported by almost half (46%) of all patients and the two most common were hypertension, and diabetes. This agrees with other studies [5]. No significant difference of comorbidity was observed between sex. In line with previous studies [19], patients with any underlying comorbidity were more likely to have severe symptoms and among reported comorbidities, hypertension was more frequently observed in severe patients. However, in contrast with other findings suggesting that comorbidities, mainly pre-existing cardiovascular disease could be associated with COVID-19 mortality [19], hypertension and heart disease were not associated with in-hospital death.

Fever, cough and fatigue were the top three common symptoms reported upon admission. These symptoms were also reported following the same order, by previous reports [13]. This list of common symptoms may help medical staff to recognise suspected COVID-19 cases, and encourage self-isolation or hospitalization, especially in remote areas with very poor COVID-19 detection capacities. Nevertheless, other non-common symptoms deserve similar attention than the more common ones.

Severe patients had significantly higher leucocyte count, elevated neutrophil rate, and lower lymphocyte rate, compared to other clinical groups. This has been also documented elsewhere [20]. Our study also revealed that most patients had elevated PCT and CRP, and higher CRP concentration was also associated with the disease severity. These inflammatory abnormalities were also reported previously [21].

Coagulation disorders, measured by the level of D-dimer were observed in more than half patients (67%). Elevated D-dimer was also reported in previous studies [22]. In line with other previous findings [23], our study also revealed that elevated D-dimer was associated with the disease severity.

Liver enzymes abnormalities were found in 66% of patients. This higher proportion of liver dysfunction on admission could be explained, by the observed time interval (≥7 days) from initial symptoms to hospitalization, which coincides with the time of occurrence of severe symptoms [13]. High proportions of AST and ALT elevation were also reported in other studies [24]. Previous studies have also shown that abnormalities of liver function, especially elevation of AST were significantly associated with COVID-19 severity [25] and mortality [26]. Our study also documented that severe group had the highest concentration of AST.

We observed a hospital case fatality rate of 20%, which seemed to be lower than those reported by other studies [14]. However, this is unlikely to reflect the true fatality rate of the disease, as out-patients and those with missing data were excluded. Independent risk factors associated with in-hospital death in this study included older age, lower SpO2, higher heart rate and higher AST level. Association of age and death [14] as well as lower SpO2 and death was also reported in China [27]. Oxygen saturation has appeared to be a reliable surrogate marker of COVID-19 illness severity and death. However, to the best of our knowledge, heart rate was only described as a predictor for a positive SARS-CoV-2 test [17].

This study reported a low prevalence (0.63%) of malaria and COVID-19. A couple of reasons may support this observation. First, the lower prevalence of malaria observed in the city center (the catchment area of Clinique Ngaliema and its neighboring communities) compared to peri-urban areas [28]; and second, the considerable proportion of patients who received antimalarial drugs before hospitalization. This is to our knowledge the first study reporting the coexistence of malaria and COVID-19 infections. Nevertheless, previous studies also have shown that co-infections including other viral, bacterial and fungal infections were rarely found among patients with COVID-19 [29].

The study has a number of limitations. First, lack of some key data (laboratory tests) and excluded variables from analysis because of missing values (high sensitive troponin, ferritin, blood gas, ionogramm etc.) that could play an important role, due to the retrospective design. Second, excluded cases, could lead to a selection bias. However, this is unlikely given that patients excluded were similar to those included in the study, in regard to all socio-demographic data. Last, although nearly half of patients included were located out of the catchment area of Clinique Ngaliema, our sample may not be representative of Kinshasa. Therefore, our findings should be generalized to COVID patients of Kinshasa with caution.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Factors associated with antimalarial use in COVID-19 patients.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all other health care workers of Clinique Ngaliema COVID-19 treatment center involved in the diagnosis and treatment of patients. We acknowledge Mr Damas Massolo and Mrs Ida Dikebelayi, Dr Freddy Kibwana, Dr Thierry Mbazu, for assisting in data collection, as well as Mr Matthieu Tshitamba, Mr Fefe Baleka, Mrs Bibi Bwiri and Mr Toguy Ndombe for assisting in sample collection and laboratory analysis.

Data Availability

The data underlying this study cannot be shared publicly, as it is the property of the Clinique Ngaliema Hospital. For these reason, the hospital would prefer to share data for research purposes, upon reasonable request, accompanied by a research proposal with a detailed description of the objectives of the study, sent directly to the steering committee of Clinique Ngaliema Hospital at the following e-mail address: infor@cliniquengaliema.org. The authors did not receive any special privileges in accessing the data

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y et al. : Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2020, 382: 1199–1207. 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. 2020.
  • 3.Nkengasong JN, Mankoula W: Looming threat of COVID-19 infection in Africa: act collectively, and fast. Lancet 2020, 395: 841–842. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30464-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Report on the Epidemiological Features of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in the Republic of Korea from January 19 to March 2, 2020. J Korean Med Sci 2020, 35: e112 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.The Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Emergency Response Epidemiology Team. Vital Surveillances: The Epidemiological Characteristics of an Outbreak of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Diseases (COVID-19)—China, 2020. 2020. China CDC Weekly> 2020, 2(8): 113–122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bezzio C, Saibeni S, Variola A, Allocca M, Massari A, Gerardi V et al. : Outcomes of COVID-19 in 79 patients with IBD in Italy: an IG-IBD study. Gut 2020, 69: 1213–1217. 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Iaccarino G, Grassi G, Borghi C, Ferri C, Salvetti M, Volpe M: Age and Multimorbidity Predict Death Among COVID-19 Patients: Results of the SARS-RAS Study of the Italian Society of Hypertension. Hypertension 2020, 76: 366–372. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Katherine Simbana-Rivera LG-BJGFS-GRFVOPL-CSrALVOPO-P. Interim Analysis of Pandemic Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the SARS-CoV-2 virus in Latin America and the Caribbean: Morbidity, Mortality and Molecular Testing Trends in the Region. 2020. medRxiv. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Giudicessi JR, Roden DM, Wilde AAM, Ackerman MJ: Genetic susceptibility for COVID-19-associated sudden cardiac death in African Americans. Heart Rhythm 2020. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Doumas M, Patoulias D, Katsimardou A, Stavropoulos K, Imprialos K, Karagiannis A: COVID19 and increased mortality in African Americans: socioeconomic differences or does the renin angiotensin system also contribute ? J Hum Hypertens 2020. 10.1038/s41371-020-0380-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.World Health Organization.(2020). Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in suspected human cases: interim guidance, 2 March 2020. 2020.
  • 12.Republique démocratique du Congo MdlSSG. Protocole de prise en charge de l'épidémie à coronavirus COVID-19. Mars 2020. 18-3-2020.
  • 13.Liu K, Fang YY, Deng Y, Liu W, Wang MF, Ma JP et al. : Clinical characteristics of novel coronavirus cases in tertiary hospitals in Hubei Province. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020, 133: 1025–1031. 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z et al. : Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395: 1054–1062. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wan S, Xiang Y, Fang W, Zheng Y, Li B, Hu Y et al. : Clinical features and treatment of COVID-19 patients in northeast Chongqing. J Med Virol 2020, 92: 797–806. 10.1002/jmv.25783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mandina MN, Makulo JRR, Bepouka BI, Longokolo MM, Odio O, Wumba DR. Expérience précoce de la réponse à la pandémie à Syndrome Respiratoire Aigu Sévère à Coronavirus SARS-COV 2 appelé aussi corona Virus disease 19 (COVID-19) aux Cliniqes Universitaires de Kinshasa. 20-June-2020. Ann. Afr. Med. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sun Y, Koh V, Marimuthu K, Ng OT, Young B, Vasoo S et al. : Epidemiological and Clinical Predictors of COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis 2020, 71: 786–792. 10.1093/cid/ciaa322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhu Y, Gao ZH, Liu YL, Xu DY, Guan TM, Li ZP et al. : Clinical and CT imaging features of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). J Infect 2020, 81: 147–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ielapi N, Licastro N, Provenzano M, Andreucci M, Franciscis S, Serra R: Cardiovascular disease as a biomarker for an increased risk of COVID-19 infection and related poor prognosis. Biomark Med 2020, 14: 713–716. 10.2217/bmm-2020-0201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhao K, Li R, Wu X, Zhao Y, Wang T, Zheng Z et al. : Clinical features in 52 patients with COVID-19 who have increased leukocyte count: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2020. 10.1007/s10096-020-03976-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu W, Tao ZW, Wang L, Yuan ML, Liu K, Zhou L et al. : Analysis of factors associated with disease outcomes in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020, 133: 1032–1038. 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y et al. : Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 2020, 395: 507–513. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Han H, Yang L, Liu R, Liu F, Wu KL, Li J et al. : Prominent changes in blood coagulation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020, 58: 1116–1120. 10.1515/cclm-2020-0188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX et al. : Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020, 382: 1708–1720. 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Parohan M, Yaghoubi S, Seraji A: Liver injury is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies. Hepatol Res 2020. 10.1111/hepr.13510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lei F, Liu YM, Zhou F, Qin JJ, Zhang P, Zhu L et al. : Longitudinal association between markers of liver injury and mortality in COVID-19 in China. Hepatology 2020. 10.1002/hep.31301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xie J, Covassin N, Fan Z, Singh P, Gao W, Li G et al. : Association Between Hypoxemia and Mortality in Patients With COVID-19. Mayo Clin Proc 2020, 95: 1138–1147. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kazadi W, Sexton JD, Bigonsa M, W'Okanga B, Way M: Malaria in primary school children and infants in kinshasa, democratic republic of the congo: surveys from the 1980s and 2000. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2004, 71: 97–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wee LE, Ko KKK, Ho WQ, Kwek GTC, Tan TT, Wijaya L: Community-acquired viral respiratory infections amongst hospitalized inpatients during a COVID-19 outbreak in Singapore: co-infection and clinical outcomes. J Clin Virol 2020, 128: 104436 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Raffaele Serra

9 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-28772

Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Clinique Ngaliema, a Public hospital in Kinshasa, in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a retrospective cohort study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Matangila,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They have suggested that this manuscript be revised according to the reviewers suggestions and resubmitted.  Provided you address the changes recommended, the manuscript will be accepted for publication. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 23 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Prof. Raffaele Serra, M.D., Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In the ethics statement in the manuscript and in the online submission form, please provide additional information about the patient records used in your retrospective study, including: a) whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them; b) the date range (month and year) during which patients' medical records were accessed; c) the date range (month and year) during which patients whose medical records were selected for this study sought treatment. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4.We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They have suggested that this manuscript be revised according to the reviewers suggestions and resubmitted.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This authors describe the epidemiological and clinical features, laboratory findings, treatment, and

outcomes of COVID‐ 19 patients in one of the selected Hospital for COVID-19 care of Kinshasa, in Democratic Republic of Congo.

The study is very interesting and novel. I wonder: Regarding prognosis what was the relationship with underlying cardiovascular disease in your study? Possibly you may focus on this issue in the discussion section. For example citing also this recent article by Ielapi N et al. Cardiovascular disease as a biomarker for an increased risk of COVID-19 infection and related poor prognosis. Biomark Med. 2020;14(9):713-716, which deals with a poor prognosis for cardiovascular patients.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 18;15(12):e0244272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244272.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


6 Dec 2020

Journal Requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

R/ OK

2. In the ethics statement in the manuscript and in the online submission form, please provide additional information about the patient records used in your retrospective study, including: a) whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them; b) the date range (month and year) during which patients' medical records were accessed; c) the date range (month and year) during which patients whose medical records were selected for this study sought treatment. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

R/ The following additional information have been added:

• All data were fully anonymized before they have been accessed. Patients whose medical records were selected for analysis sought treatment from March to July 2020 and their data were accessed from Jun to July 2020.

R/ Patients did not sign a written informed consent to have their medical data used in research. However, upon admission, patients or their legal surrogate signed a hospitalized patient’s charter that specified that their medical records could be further used for research.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

R/ My ORCID iD is : 0000-0002-9025-3604

4.We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

R/ The data is the property of the Clinique Ngaliema Hospital, and the latter has imposed a restriction on the availability of the data because, even if they were anonymized, taking into account the individually identifiable health information, in particular: name, full address, date of birth and professional affiliation, which have been deleted, they still contain information such as: age, sex, community or municipality, past medical history of the patients and the period they were hospitalized. These information combined, still have the potential to be linked to the identity of the patient to whom it corresponds, by a patient family member or a close person. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, after surviving COVID-19 infection, a number of persons face stigma in their communities and work places. This is nowadays a matter of great concern. Therefore, discovering their data online, in the format of a dataset, may drive patients to become reluctant to sick care at Clinique Ngaliema. In addition, these data also contain sensitive patient information such as death and abnormal laboratory results. For these reason, the hospital would prefer to share data for research purposes, upon reasonable request, accompanied by a research proposal with a detailed description of the objectives of the study, sent directly to the steering committee of Clinique Ngaliema Hospital at the following e-mail address: infor@cliniquengaliema.org or to the corresponding author: matangilaj@yahoo.fr . This restriction applies only to COVID-19 data.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

R/ Please consider the answer above

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They have suggested that this manuscript be revised according to the reviewers suggestions and resubmitted.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

________________________________________

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

________________________________________

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

________________________________________

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

________________________________________

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This authors describe the epidemiological and clinical features, laboratory findings, treatment, and

outcomes of COVID‐ 19 patients in one of the selected Hospital for COVID-19 care of Kinshasa, in Democratic Republic of Congo.

The study is very interesting and novel. I wonder: Regarding prognosis what was the relationship with underlying cardiovascular disease in your study? Possibly you may focus on this issue in the discussion section. For example citing also this recent article by Ielapi N et al. Cardiovascular disease as a biomarker for an increased risk of COVID-19 infection and related poor prognosis. Biomark Med. 2020;14(9):713-716, which deals with a poor prognosis for cardiovascular patients.

R/ The following paragraph has been added in the discussion section:

In line with previous studies, patients with any underlying comorbidity were more likely to have severe symptoms and among reported comorbidities, hypertension was more frequently observed in severe patients. However, in contrast with other findings suggesting that comorbidities, mainly pre-existing cardiovascular disease could be associated with COVID-19 mortality, hypertension and heart disease were not associated with in-hospital death.

And the following article has been cited: Ielapi N et al. Cardiovascular disease as a biomarker for an increased risk of COVID-19 infection and related poor prognosis. Biomark Med. 2020;14(9):713-716, which deals with a poor prognosis for cardiovascular patients.

________________________________________

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

R/ No attachment found

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_3.docx

Decision Letter 1

Raffaele Serra

8 Dec 2020

Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Clinique Ngaliema, a Public hospital in Kinshasa, in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a retrospective cohort study

PONE-D-20-28772R1

Dear Dr. Matangila,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Prof. Raffaele Serra, M.D., Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

amended manuscript is acceptable.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Raffaele Serra

11 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-28772R1

Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Clinique Ngaliema, a Public hospital in Kinshasa, in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a retrospective cohort study  

Dear Dr. Matangila:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Raffaele Serra

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Factors associated with antimalarial use in COVID-19 patients.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_3.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The data underlying this study cannot be shared publicly, as it is the property of the Clinique Ngaliema Hospital. For these reason, the hospital would prefer to share data for research purposes, upon reasonable request, accompanied by a research proposal with a detailed description of the objectives of the study, sent directly to the steering committee of Clinique Ngaliema Hospital at the following e-mail address: infor@cliniquengaliema.org. The authors did not receive any special privileges in accessing the data


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES