Table 2.

Parameter estimates of mental health treatment utilization

Parameter estimate	Unst.	St.	p
Measurement model
Regression parameters
Perceived severity → Depression impacted functioning	1.00	0.82	.00
Perceived severity → Depression hurt academics	0.85	0.69	.00
Perceived benefit → Belief in medication	0.81	0.70	.00
Perceived benefit → Belief in therapy	1.00	0.86	.00
Perceived barriers → Personal stigma	0.84	0.32	.00
Perceived barriers → Failure to perceive threat	1.00	0.38	.00
Self‐efficacy → Knowledge of mental illness	1.00	0.50	.00
Self‐efficacy → Knowledge of campus resources	0.66	0.33	.00
Cues‐to‐action → Recent visit to medical provider	1.00	0.42	.00
Cues‐to‐action → Recent informal support	1.51	0.63	.00
Covariance parameters
Perceived severity ↔ Perceived barriers	−0.46	−1.48	.00
Perceived severity ↔ Perceived benefit	−0.05	−0.08	.20
Perceived severity ↔ Self‐efficacy	0.14	0.34	.00
Perceived severity ↔ Cues‐to‐action	0.22	0.64	.00
Perceived benefit ↔ Perceived barriers	0.20	0.60	.00
Perceived benefit ↔ Self‐efficacy	−0.19	−0.44	.00
Perceived benefit ↔ Cues‐to‐action	−0.13	−0.36	.00
Perceived barriers ↔ Self‐efficacy	−0.20	−1.06	.00
Perceived barriers ↔ Cues‐to‐action	−0.21	−1.31	.00
Self‐efficacy ↔ Cues‐to‐action	0.20	0.94	.00
Structural model
Perceived severity ↔ Perceived barriers	−0.44	−2.01	.01
Perceived severity ↔ Perceived benefit	−0.02	−0.03	.62
Perceived severity ↔ Self‐efficacy	0.11	0.18	.04
Perceived severity ↔ Cues‐to‐action	0.21	0.60	.00
Perceived severity ↔ Mental health treatment utilization	0.23	0.28	.00
Perceived benefit ↔ Perceived barriers	0.16	0.71	.02
Perceived benefit ↔ Self‐efficacy	−0.17	−0.28	.00
Perceived benefit ↔ Cues‐to‐action	−0.12	−0.33	.00
Perceived benefit ↔ Mental health treatment utilization	−0.36	−0.42	.00
Perceived barriers ↔ Self‐efficacy	−0.31	−1.59	.02
Perceived barriers ↔ Cues‐to‐action	−0.14	−1.18	.01
Perceived barriers ↔ Mental health treatment utilization	−0.39	−1.46	.01
Self‐efficacy ↔ Cues‐to‐action	0.18	0.59	.00
Self‐efficacy ↔ Mental health treatment utilization	0.69	0.95	.00
Cues‐to‐action ↔ Mental health treatment utilization	0.27	0.62	.00

A p‐value of .00 is used to represent p < .005. χ ²(63) = 123.24, p < .001, Comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.98; Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) = 0.96; Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.01 (90% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.01–0.02, p = 1.00); WRMR = 0.81

Abbreviations: St., STDY standardized; Unst., unstandardized.