Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 8;4(4):txaa203. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa203

Table 3.

Effect of microbial feed additives on feed intake and growth performance in lambs at d 0, d 21, d 42, and d 63

Treatmentsb
Itema CON
(n = 7)
FP
(n = 7)
SCFP
(n = 7)
MSCFP
(n = 7)
SEM P-value
Intake, g/kg0.75 BW
 DM 67.9 68.4 68.6 69.6 1.15 0.77
 OM 64.5 65.0 65.2 66.1 1.06 0.78
 CP 11.0 11.1 11.1 11.2 0.18 0.80
 NDF 19.5 19.7 19.7 20.0 0.33 0.77
 ADF 11.1 11.3 11.2 11.5 0.19 0.65
 ME, MJ/kg0.75 BW 0.75 0.76 0.76 0.77 0.012 0.77
Initial BW, kg (0 d) 24.3 23.8 24.5 24.4 1.62 0.95
Final BW, kg
 21 d 28.2 28.1 28.8 28.8 1.48 0.98
 42 d 32.7 32.3 33.2 33.5 1.51 0.95
 63 d 37.3 37.3 38.2 38.3 1.64 0.95
ADG, g
 0–21 d 184 204 205 209 6.66 0.03
 21–42 d 213 200 211 225 8.77 0.33
 42–63 d 218 237 238 226 9.95 0.50
 0–63 d 205 214 218 220 6.82 0.04
FE
 0–21 d 0.203 0.230 0.222 0.226 0.01 0.01
 21–42 d 0.207 0.192 0.198 0.205 0.01 0.69
 42–63 d 0.196 0.208 0.204 0.192 0.01 0.71
 0–63 d 0.202 0.209 0.207 0.206 0.01 0.94

aBW, body weight; DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; ME, metabolizable energy ADG, average daily gain; FE, feed efficiency (gain:feed).

bCON, without microbial additive; FP, Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus plantarum; SCFP, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) plus FP; MSCFP, Megasphaera elsdenii plus SC plus FP.