Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 28;10:77. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_187_2020

Table 1:

Comparison of MR venography techniques.[16,21]

TOF-MRV PC-MRV CE-MRV
Principle Flow enhancement Phase shift T1 shortening
Sequence Gradient echo-based Gradient echo-based Gradient echo-based
Gadolinium No No Yes
Acquisition time 5–8 min >15 min* Approx. 4 min
Background Partly suppressed Suppressed Enhancing lesions seen
Factors for accuracy Saturation of exogenous signal (arteries) Operator for selection of appropriate VENC Scan timing for maximum venous enhancement
Flow velocity Can detect slow flow Depends on the VENC Independent
Flow direction Not detected Detected Not detected
Flow quantification No Yes No
*

Long acquisition time of PC-MRV is due to three gradient directions used to detect flowing spins in all directions. Acquisition time has now been reduced with the help of parallel imaging techniques refer [Table 2].[16,17] TOF-MRV: Time-of-flight magnetic resonance venography, PC-MRV: Phase-contrast magnetic resonance venography, CE-MRV: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography, VENC: Velocity encoding gradient