Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 17;8:e10538. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10538

Table 1. Regression analyses (rp) among the abundance of floating biomass and micro-propagules, and the environmental factors.

Micro- propagule Micro- propagule (SCAR+) SST Salinity DO Chl a DIN PO4-P Distance
Floating biomass 0.036, 0.858 0.067, 0.738 0.155, 0.440 0.500, 0.008** −0.328, 0.095 −0.271, 0.171 −0.011, 0.956 0.364, 0.062
Floating biomass (SCAR+) 0.086, 0.669 0.055, 0.787 0.165, 0.411 0.469, 0.014* −0.349, 0.074 −0.284, 0.152 −0.28, 0.890 0.372, 0.056
Micro-propagule 0.311, 0.114 −0.152, 0.449 −0.244, 0.219 0.078, 0.697 0.221, 0.267 0.008, 0.968 −0.656, 0.000**
Micro-propagule (SCAR+) 0.068, 0.735 0.233, 0.243 0.011, 0.955 0.068, 0.738 −0.186, 0.352 −0.051, 0.802 −0.401, 0.038*
SST −0.775, 0.000** −0.105, 0.601 −0.355, 0.069 0.790, 0.000** 0.495, 0.009** −0.194, 0.331
Salinity 0.237, 0.233 0.368, 0.059 −0.911, 0.000** −0.604, 0.001** 0.240, 0.228
DO −0.082, 0.686 −0.275, 0.166 −0.053, 0.794 0.236, 0.235
Chl a −0.225, 0.259 −0.267, 0.178 −0.336, 0.086
DIN 0.567, 0.002** −0.220, 0.270
PO4-P 0.101, 0.615

Notes.

Bold fonts indicate significant values of Pearson correlation.

*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.