Table 3. Estimated benchmark dose (BMD) and benchmark dose lower limit (BMDL) for different continuous data sets, different models and different levels of BMR using PROAST, BMDS and bmd.
BMD | BMDL | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data set |
Std | Rep | Model | BMR | PROAST | BMDS | bmd | PROAST profile |
BMDS profile |
bmd delta |
bmd inverse |
bmd bootstrap |
||
A | 1 | 10 | Log–logistica | 0.05 | 0.088 | 0.144 | 0.144 | 0 | 0.050 | 0.037 | 0.082 | 0.051 | ||
0.1 | 0.129 | 0.200 | 0.200 | 0 | 0.080 | 0.077 | 0.119 | 0.080 | ||||||
Weibull2 | 0.05 | 0.040 | 0.126 | 0.126 | 0 | 0.018 | 0.004 | 0.063 | 0.017 | |||||
0.1 | 0.070 | 0.183 | 0.183 | 0 | 0.034 | 0.038 | 0.097 | 0.032 | ||||||
0.1 | 10 | Log–logistic | 0.05 | 0.101 | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.091 | 0.105 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.096 | |||
0.1 | 0.148 | 0.154 | 0.154 | 0.135 | 0.151 | 0.142 | 0.140 | 0.140 | ||||||
Weibull | 0.05 | 0.049 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.041 | 0.060 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | |||||
0.1 | 0.086 | 0.115 | 0.115 | 0.073 | 0.097 | 0.099 | 0.098 | 0.098 | ||||||
0.1 | 3 | Log–logistic | 0.05 | 0.092 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.080 | 0.078 | 0.075 | 0.077 | 0.079 | |||
0.1 | 0.138 | 0.140 | 0.140 | 0.121 | 0.1156 | 0.114 | 0.114 | 0.117 | ||||||
Weibull | 0.05 | 0.043 | 0.066 | 0.066 | 0.031 | 0.040 | 0.037 | 0.043 | 0.043 | |||||
0.1 | 0.076 | 0.105 | 0.105 | 0.058 | 0.067 | 0.066 | 0.072 | 0.072 | ||||||
B | 1 | 10 | Log–logistic | 0.05 | 0.003 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0 | 0.005 | 0 | 0.035 | 0.005 | ||
0.1 | 0.008 | 0.148 | 0.149 | 0 | 0.011 | 0 | 0.06 | 0.012 | ||||||
Weibull | 0.05 | 0 | 0.045 | 0.045 | 0 | 0.015 | 0 | 0.014 | 0.003 | |||||
0.1 | 0.002 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0 | 0.030 | 0 | 0.029 | 0.007 | ||||||
0.1 | 10 | Log–logistic | 0.05 | 0.033 | 0.032 | 0.032 | 0.019 | 0.023 | 0.024 | 0.023 | 0.023 | |||
0.1 | 0.07 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.043 | 0.050 | 0.054 | 0.051 | 0.05 | ||||||
Weibull | 0.05 | 0.008 | 0.056 | 0.016 | 0.003 | 0.051 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |||||
0.1 | 0.022 | 0.112 | 0.038 | 0.012 | 0.102 | 0.029 | 0.027 | 0.027 | ||||||
0.1 | 3 | Log–logistic | 0.05 | 0.029 | 0.036 | 0.036 | 0.016 | 0.028 | 0.024 | 0.023 | 0.023 | |||
0.1 | 0.064 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.038 | 0.051 | 0.055 | 0.051 | 0.051 | ||||||
Weibull | 0.05 | 0.008 | 0.056 | 0.019 | 0.004 | 0.049 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |||||
0.1 | 0.023 | 0.113 | 0.044 | 0.012 | 0.099 | 0.031 | 0.029 | 0.03 | ||||||
C | 1 | 10 | Log–logisticc | 0.05 | – | 0.717 | 0.717 | – | 0.047 | 0 | 0.261 | 0.079 | ||
0.1 | – | 0.971 | 0.971 | – | 0.098102 | 0 | 0.369 | 0.155 | ||||||
Weibull | 0.05 | – | 0.666 | 0.666 | – | 0.051 | 0 | 0.224 | 0.067 | |||||
0.1 | – | 0.930 | 0.930 | – | 0.102 | 0 | 0.329 | 0.134 | ||||||
0.1 | 10 | Log–logistic | 0.05 | 0.847 | 0.843 | 0.843 | 0.737 | 0.832 | 0.683 | 0.696 | 0.693 | |||
0.1 | 1.137 | 1.126 | 1.126 | 1.010 | 1.111 | 0.954 | 0.953 | 0.957 | ||||||
Weibull | 0.05 | 0.827 | 0.833 | 0.833 | 0.705 | 0.677 | 0.651 | 0.679 | 0.677 | |||||
0.1 | 1.155 | 1.132 | 1.132 | 1.010 | 0.950 | 0.929 | 0.948 | 0.952 | ||||||
0.1 | 3 | Log–logistic | 0.05 | 1.724 | 3.262 | 2.621 | 1.070 | 3.219 | 0 | 1.501 | 0.821 | |||
0.1 | 2.054 | 3.491 | 2.905 | 1.380 | 3.459 | 0 | 1.684 | 1.107 | ||||||
Weibull | 0.05 | 2.007 | 3.533 | 2.647 | 1.090 | 3.431 | 0 | 1.513 | 0.802 | |||||
0.1 | 2.382 | 3.753 | 2.956 | 1.450 | 3.329 | 0 | 1.716 | 1.095 |
Notes.
Hill model for BMDS and PROAST. The Hill model was fitted as an unrestricted model in BMDS.
Exponential model in BMDS and PROAST. The exponential model was fitted as a restricted model in BMDS.
No model fitted for this data set using PROAST.