Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;20(1):406–412. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v20i1.47

Table III.

Relationships between the prevalence of zinc deficiency and other variables among children with diarrhoea.

Parameter Zinc status Statistical comparison

Zinc-
deficient
n (%)
Normal
n (%)
Total
n (%)
Socio-economic status
Low social class 69 (33.8) 135 (66.2) 204 (100.0) χ2 = 6.14,
p = 0.013
High social class 7 (15.2) 39 (84.8) 46 (100.0)
 
Fever
Yes 119 (65.4) 63 (34.6) 182 (100.0) χ2 = 5.62,
p = 0.018
No 55 (80.9) 13 (19.1) 68 (100.0)
 
Vomiting
Yes 111 (73.5) 40 (26.5) 151 (100.0) χ2 = 2.76,
p = 0.097
No 63 (63.6) 36 (36.4) 99 (100.0)
 
Underweight
Underweight 15 (33.3) 30 (66.7) 45 (100.0) χ2 = 0.22,
p = 0.637
Normal 61 (29.8) 144 (70.2) 205 (100.0)
 
Stunting
Yes 11 (30.6) 25 (69.4) 36 (100.0) χ2 = 0.00,
p = 0.983
No 65 (30.4) 149 (69.6) 214 (100.0)
 
Wasting
Yes 15 (34.1) 29 (65.9) 44 (100.0) χ2 = 0.34,
p = 0.558
No 61 (29.6) 145 (70.4) 206 (100.0)
 
Dehydration status
Dehydrated 18 (26.5) 50 (73.5) 68 (100.0) χ2 = 0.68,
p = 0.409
No signs of
dehydration
58 (31.9) 124 (68.1) 182 (100.0)
 
Severity of dehydration
Mild 10 (27.8) 26 (72.7) 36 (100.0) χ2 = 6.23,
p = 0.044
Moderate 2 (10.0) 18 (90.0) 20 (100.0)
Severe 6 (50.0) 6 (50.0) 12 (100.0)