Table 3A.
Cluster 1: low impact (n = 298) | Cluster 2: medium impact (n = 163) | Cluster 3: high impact (n = 83) | χ2 (gl)f | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | C3 | C3 | C1 C2 | 26.70 (2) | <0.001 |
Male | 59.6% | 47.9% | 28.0% | ||
Female | 40.4% | 52.1% | 72.0% | ||
Socioeconomic level | C3 | C3 | C1 C2 | 21.02 (8) | 0.003 |
Very bad | 0% | 0% | 2.4% | ||
Bad | 4.0% | 4.3% | 14.5% | ||
Medium | 60.1% | 57.7% | 55.4% | ||
Good | 31.9% | 35.0% | 27.7% | ||
Very Good | 4.0% | 3.1% | 0% | ||
Academic coursea | C2 C3 | C1 | C1 | 48.02 (10) | <0.001 |
1° ESO (year 8) | 7.1% | 5.0% | 0% | ||
2° ESO (year 9) | 23.8% | 13.6% | 6.8% | ||
3° ESO (year 10) | 23.5% | 20.0% | 13.5% | ||
4° ESO (year 11) | 22.8% | 25.7% | 29.7% | ||
1° BACHILLER (year 12) | 10.0% | 25.7% | 31.1% | ||
2° BACHILLER (year 13) | 12.8% | 10.0% | 18.9% | ||
Competitive level | 4.37 (6) | 0.634 | |||
Regional | 35.2% | 39.3% | 45.8% | ||
Autonomic | 35.2% | 29.4% | 28.9% | ||
National | 22.5% | 25.2% | 20.5% | ||
International | 7.1% | 6.1% | 4.8% | ||
Lockdown training conditions | C3 | C1 | 12.63 (6) | 0.045 | |
Not training | 10.6% | 12.5% | 24.7% | ||
Training with important changes | 55.0% | 57.5% | 54.3% | ||
Training with minor changes | 27.6% | 25.0% | 18.5% | ||
Training as always | 6.8% | 5.0% | 2.5% | ||
Satisfaction with club/institution | C2 | C1 | 22.87 (8) | 0.003 | |
Very unsatisfied | 4.7% | 3.1% | 8.4% | ||
Unsatisfied | 3.7% | 9.3% | 4.8% | ||
Indifferent | 19.5% | 22.2% | 24.1% | ||
Satisfied | 32.7% | 40.1% | 42.2% | ||
Very satisfied | 39.4% | 25.3% | 20.5% |
C1, Cluster 1; C2, Cluster 2; C3, Cluster 3. Boldface indicates inter-group significant differences (p < 0.05). Superscripts indicate intra-group significant differences (corrected p < 0.017) using Chi-square test.
Academic course was computed removing those participants pursuing tertiary education programs (participants excluded = 49).
All inter-group comparisons that included a group with n < 5, were computed using Fishers’ exact test.