Table 4.
KAM | KFM | KEM | KAM + KFM | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First peak | Moderate | - | - | - | ||
mKCF | Second peak | Strong | - | - | - | |
Patients after TKR | Maximal | - | - | - | - | |
First peak | - | - | - | - | ||
tKCF | Second peak | - | - | - | - | |
Maximal | - | - | - | - | ||
First peak | Strong | - | - | Strong | ||
mKCF | Second peak | Moderate | - | - | Moderate | |
Patients with mKOA | Maximal | - | - | - | - | |
First peak | Strong | Strong | - | Strong | ||
tKCF | Second peak | Low | Moderate | - | Moderate | |
maximal | - | - | - | - | ||
first peak | - | x | - | Moderate | ||
mKCF | Second peak | - | - | - | - | |
Patients after ACLR | Maximal | Strong | - | - | Strong | |
First peak | - | - | - | - | ||
tKCF | Second peak | - | - | - | - | |
Maximal | - | - | - | - | ||
Patients after APM | mKCF | First peak | Moderate | Low | - | - |
First peak | Strong | Low | x | - | ||
mKCF | Second peak | Strong | x | Moderate | - | |
Healthy controls | Maximal | Moderate | Low | Moderate | Strong | |
First peak | Strong | Low | - | Strong | ||
tKCF | Second peak | x | Moderate | - | Strong | |
Maximal | Low | - | - | - |
The predictability of the internal joint contact forces is classified in four different stages: -: relationship was not investigated; x: no predictability (in red); low: low predictability (in orange); moderate: moderate predictability (in yellow); strong: strong predictability (in green). The stages are related to the investigated R2-values which were interpreted as low below 0.25, between 0.25 and 0.49 as moderate and above 0.49 as high Hinkle et al. (1988); Kotrlik and Williams (2003).
KAM, knee adduction moment; KFM, knee flexion moment; KEM, knee extension moment; mKCF, medial knee joint contact force; tKCF, total knee joint contact force; TKR, total knee replacement; mKOA, medial knee osteoarthritis; ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; APM, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.