Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 7;8:603907. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.603907

Table 4.

Summary table of the findings about the relationship between external knee joint moments and internal mKCFs and tKCFs.

KAM KFM KEM KAM + KFM
First peak Moderate - - -
mKCF Second peak Strong - - -
Patients after TKR Maximal - - - -
First peak - - - -
tKCF Second peak - - - -
Maximal - - - -
First peak Strong - - Strong
mKCF Second peak Moderate - - Moderate
Patients with mKOA Maximal - - - -
First peak Strong Strong - Strong
tKCF Second peak Low Moderate - Moderate
maximal - - - -
first peak - x - Moderate
mKCF Second peak - - - -
Patients after ACLR Maximal Strong - - Strong
First peak - - - -
tKCF Second peak - - - -
Maximal - - - -
Patients after APM mKCF First peak Moderate Low - -
First peak Strong Low x -
mKCF Second peak Strong x Moderate -
Healthy controls Maximal Moderate Low Moderate Strong
First peak Strong Low - Strong
tKCF Second peak x Moderate - Strong
Maximal Low - - -

The predictability of the internal joint contact forces is classified in four different stages: -: relationship was not investigated; x: no predictability (in red); low: low predictability (in orange); moderate: moderate predictability (in yellow); strong: strong predictability (in green). The stages are related to the investigated R2-values which were interpreted as low below 0.25, between 0.25 and 0.49 as moderate and above 0.49 as high Hinkle et al. (1988); Kotrlik and Williams (2003).

KAM, knee adduction moment; KFM, knee flexion moment; KEM, knee extension moment; mKCF, medial knee joint contact force; tKCF, total knee joint contact force; TKR, total knee replacement; mKOA, medial knee osteoarthritis; ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; APM, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.