Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 1;49(4):1147–1158. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz161

Table 2.

Simulation study results for interaction term between risk factors varying number of shared variants: median estimate of θ12=0.3, standard deviation (SD) of estimates, median standard error (SE), empirical power (%) to reject null at 5% significance, and empirical coverage (%) of 95% confidence interval

Shared variants Total IVs Median SD Median SE Power (%) Coverage (%)
Method 1—full set of interactions:
0a 120 0.3080 0.0722 0.0718 98.8 95.2
1 119 0.3080 0.0723 0.0719 98.8 95.0
3 114 0.3090 0.0717 0.0716 98.9 95.3
5 105 0.3078 0.0716 0.0707 98.9 94.9
8 84 0.3073 0.0682 0.0687 99.3 95.2
10 65 0.3056 0.0670 0.0673 99.2 95.3
Method 2—reduced set of interactions:
1 100 0.3073 0.0804 0.0794 96.7 94.9
3 66 0.3088 0.1003 0.0997 86.1 95.2
5 40 0.3056 0.1340 0.1334 63.2 95.7
8 16 0.3054 0.2520 0.2471 23.9 97.1
10 10 0.3057 0.3883 0.3891 8.7 99.3
Method 3—continuous gene scores:
0 3 0.3000 0.1106 0.1091 77.5 95.8
1 3 0.3005 0.1111 0.1088 77.8 95.4
3 3 0.2998 0.1051 0.1048 81.0 95.6
5 3 0.3015 0.0997 0.0980 85.6 95.5
8 3 0.3003 0.0857 0.0858 93.0 95.8
10 3 0.2993 32.31 0.1711 42.7 99.2
Method 4—dichotomized gene scores:
0 3 0.2972 0.1777 0.1722 41.8 96.0
1 3 0.3028 0.1757 0.1724 42.2 96.3
3 3 0.3002 0.1818 0.1773 39.8 96.4
5 3 0.3005 0.1948 0.1884 36.6 96.6
8 3 0.3007 0.2474 0.2340 25.7 97.2
10 3 0.2896 133.5 1.3578 0.7 100.0
a

When there are no shared variants, methods 1 and 2 are equivalent.