Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;66(5):505–514. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoaa051

Table 1.

Interaction term estimates and standard errors for each pair of covariates are compared

Contrast Estimate SE t-ratio P-value
Interactions among observed genes
Classes I– II −2.17 0.43 −5.01 <0.001
Class I–Non-OR −0.19 0.54 −0.36 0.99
Class II–Non-OR 1.98 0.36 5.45 <0.001
Interactions among simulations
Purifyingω=0.01 to Purifyingω=0.1 −1.51 0.16 −9.40 <0.001
Purifyingω=0.01 to Diversifyingω=2.5 16.22 0.15 107.45 <0.001
Purifyingω=0.1 to Diversifyingω=2.5 14.72 0.18 81.27 <0.001
Interactions between observed genes and simulated scenarios 
Class I—Purifyingω=0.01 −0.66 0.42 −1.56 0.63
Class I—Purifyingω=0.1 −2.17 0.43 −4.97 <0.001
Class I—Diversifyingω=2.5 −16.89 0.43 −39.03 < 0.001
Class II—Purifyingω=0.01 1.51 0.15 9.79 <0.001
Class II—Purifyingω=0.1 0.01 0.18 0.03 1
Class II—Diversifyingω=2.5 −14.71 0.18 −83.58 <0.001
Non-OR—Purifyingω=0.01 −0.47 0.35 −1.33 0.77
Non-OR—Purifyingω=0.1 −1.98 0.37 −5.40 <0.001
Non-OR—Diversifyingω=2.5 16.70 0.36 46.85 <0.001

P-values were corrected for multiple comparisons. Purifyingω=0.01 refers to strong purifying selection, purifyingω=0.1 is weak purifying selection, and diversifyingω=2.5 is diversifying or positive selection.