Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 24;27(11):1675–1687. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa104

Table 4.

Comparison of PheMap-based PheWAS to phecodes and previous PheWAS results

PheMap
Phecodes
Previous PheWAS
Phenotypea Beta (95% CI)b P Value Cases OR (95% CI) P Value Cases OR (95% CI) P Value
FTO (rs8050136, n = 56 990)c
 Obesity 2.1 (1.7–2.6) 1.0 × 10−20 8695 1.17 (1.13–1.21) 6.0 × 10−14 1662 1.25 (1.16–1.35) 2.1 × 10−9
 Diabetes mellitus 1.5 (1.1–2.0) 1.6 × 10−12 1948 1.04 (0.96–1.12) 3.3 × 10−2
 Obstructive sleep apnea 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 1.2 × 10−8 6697 1.08 (1.04–1.13) 2.1× 10−4 2335 1.14 (1.07–1.22) 3.3 × 10−5
 Overweight 0.9 (0.5–1.0) 4.8 × 10−8 1743 0.99 (0.91–1.08) 9.0× 10−1 3943 1.17 (1.11–1.24) 1.4 × 10−8
 Chondrocalcinosis 0.7 (0.4–1.0) 9.3 × 10−8 286 0.99 (0.80–1.19) 9.4× 10−1
HLA-DRB1 (rs3135388, n = 56 997)d
 Multiple sclerosis 2.2 (1.8–2.6) 2.9 × 10−28 1505 2.20 (2.06–2.35) 6.4 × 10−26 89 2.24 (1.56–3.16) 2.8 × 10−6
 Type 1 diabetes −2.0 (−2.6 to −1.4) 4.3 × 10−12 2752 0.45 (0.30–0.61) 2.6 × 10−23
 Other demyelinating diseases of central nervous system 1.4 (1.0–1.9) 1.1 × 10−9 738 1.90 (1.68–2.11) 4.1 × 10−9
 Systemic sclerosis 1.6 (1.0–2.2) 9.3 × 10−8 357 1.18 (0.82–1.53) 3.7 × 10−1
 Secondary diabetes mellitus −1.0 (−1.4 to −0.6) 2.4 × 10−7 784 1.24 (0.99–1.48) 8.6 × 10−2
TCF7L2 (rs7903146, n = 56 982) e
 Diabetes mellitus 2.6 (2.3–3.0) 5.8 × 10−28 1948 1.30 (1.22–1.38) 5.3 × 10−10
 Type 2 diabetes 0.9 (0.6–1.2) 1.2 × 10−14 13 694 1.25 (1.21–1.28) 5.6× 10−37
 Type 1 diabetes 1.0 (0.8–1.3) 2.8 × 10−11 2752 1.17 (1.10–1.24) 1.2 × 10−5
 Secondary diabetes mellitus 0.6 (0.2–0.8) 2.0 × 10−10 784 1.21 (1.08–1.34) 3.8 × 10−3
 Other abnormal glucose 1.0 (0.7–1.4) 1.1 × 10−7 3102 1.03 (0.97–1.10) 3.3 × 10−1

Note: CI: confidence interval; PheWAS: phenome-wide association studies; OR: odds ratio; SNP: single nucleotide polymorphisms.

a

Top 5 SNP disease associations (by P value) that met the Bonferroni correction (P < 5 × 10−5).

b

Beta represents the percent increase in phenotype case probability per copy of minor allele. Betas and 95% CIs were derived from linear regression models adjusted for sex, age, date of first visit, date of last follow-up, and first 10 principle components.

c

Cronin et al, 2014.[37]

d

Denny et al, 2010.[25]

e

No prior PheWAS on rs7903146 in TCF7L2.