Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 14;3(3):431–438. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa029

Table 4.

Upper: classifier accuracy and expected calibration error for boosting before and after isotonic calibration and Lower: expected calibration error for random forest model before and after isotonic calibration

Data elements Weighted-F1 ECE Isotonic weighted-F1 Isotonic ECE
Classification calibration
 Gleason grade—primary 0.95 0.03 0.93 0.03
 Gleason grade—secondary 0.94 0.08 0.92 0.14
 Gleason grade—tertiary 0.91 0.05 0.91 0.03
 Tumor histology 0.99 0.009 0.99 0.007
 Cribriform pattern 0.995 0.007 0.995 0.017
 Treatment effect 0.99 0.007 0.99 0.003
 Tumor margin status 0.96 0.15 0.94 0.013
 Benign margin status 0.994 0.007 0.995 0.019
 Perineural invasion 0.95 0.26 0.96 0.02
 Seminal vesicle invasion 0.987 0.16 0.97 0.02
 Extraprostatic extension 0.96 0.12 0.96 0.01
 Lymph node status 0.96 0.04 0.98 0.01

Data elements ECE Isotonic ECE

Extractor calibration
 T stage 0.155 0.016
 N stage 0.144 0.013
 M stage 0.007 0.005
 Estimated volume of tumor 0.221 0.021
 Prostate weight 0.278 0.033