Table 2. Macrel achieves accuracy comparable to the state-of-art in hemolytic peptides classification.
Models implemented by Chaudhary et al. (2016) were generically called HemoPI-1 due to the datasets used in the training and benchmarking (the best values per column are in bold).
| Method | Acc. | Sp. | Sn. | Pr. | MCC | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HemoPI-1C,SVM* | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.91 | Chaudhary et al. (2016) |
| HemoPI-1H* | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.91 | Chaudhary et al. (2016) |
| HemoPI-1C,IBK* | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.89 | Chaudhary et al. (2016) |
| HemoPI-1C,RF* | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.89 | Chaudhary et al. (2016) |
| Macrel | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.88 | This study |
| HemoPI-1C,Log* | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.87 | Chaudhary et al. (2016) |
| HemoPI-1C,MP* | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.87 | Chaudhary et al. (2016) |
| HemoPI-1C,JK48* | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.78 | Chaudhary et al. (2016) |
Note:
These data were retrieved from the original article.