Table 5.
Model of integration between the SRH and HIV services and the specific integration service in place by level of care, Karamoja 2016
HC II n (%) |
HC III n (%) |
HC IV n (%) |
General Hosp n (%) |
Regional Hosp n (%) |
Karamoja n (%) |
||
Models of SRH and HIV integration |
1. Services located in the same service site, with the same provider, offered on the same day (the “kiosk” model of integration) |
35 (44) |
28 (74) |
4 (100) | 4 (75) |
0 (0) |
70 (55) |
2. Services located in the same service site, with different providers, offered on the same day (the “supermarket” model of integration) |
11 (14) |
6 (16) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
1 (100) | 18 (14) |
|
3. Services offered with different providers at different service site within the same facility on the same day (the “shopping mall” model of integration) |
0 (0) | 1 (3) | 0 (0) | 1 (25) | 0 (0) | 2 (1) | |
4. Referred to another facility | 9 (11) | 2 (5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 11 (9) | |
5. No integration | 24 (30) | 1 (3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 25 (20) | |
Specific SRH and HIV integration |
Family planning + HIV services | 39 (49) | 33 (87) | 4 (100 | 4 (100 | 1(100) | 81 (64) |
STI + HIV services | 38 (48) | 35 (92) | 4 (100 | 4 (100 | 1(100) | 82 (65) | |
Maternal and Newborn care + HIV services | 44 (56) | 32 (84) | 4(100) | 4(100) | 1(100) | 83 (65) | |
Sexual Gender Based Violence (SGBV) + HIV services |
18 (23) | 21 (55) | 3 (75) | 4(100) | 1(100) | 47 (37) | |
Post abortal care + HIV services | 19 (24) | 30 (79) | 4 (100 | 2 (50) | 1(100) | 56 (44) | |
Cervical cancer screening + HIV services | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (50) | 1(100) | 3 (2) | |
Adolescent SRH + HIV services | 29 (37) | 30 (79) | 4(100) | 2 (50) | 1(100) | 66 (52) |