Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep;20(3):1053–1065. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v20i3.8

Table 5.

Model of integration between the SRH and HIV services and the specific integration service in place by level of care, Karamoja 2016

HC
II
n (%)
HC
III
n (%)
HC IV
n (%)
General Hosp
n (%)
Regional Hosp
n (%)
Karamoja
n (%)
Models of
SRH and
HIV
integration
1. Services located in the same service site, with the
same provider, offered on the same day
(the “kiosk” model of integration)
35
(44)
28
(74)
4 (100) 4
(75)
0
(0)
70
(55)
2. Services located in the same service site, with
different providers, offered on the same day (the
“supermarket” model of integration)
11
(14)
6
(16)
0
(0)
0
(0)
1 (100) 18
(14)
3. Services offered with different providers at
different service site within the same facility on the
same day (the “shopping mall” model of
integration)
0 (0) 1 (3) 0 (0) 1 (25) 0 (0) 2 (1)
4. Referred to another facility 9 (11) 2 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 11 (9)
5. No integration 24 (30) 1 (3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 25 (20)
Specific
SRH and
HIV
integration
Family planning + HIV services 39 (49) 33 (87) 4 (100 4 (100 1(100) 81 (64)
STI + HIV services 38 (48) 35 (92) 4 (100 4 (100 1(100) 82 (65)
Maternal and Newborn care + HIV services 44 (56) 32 (84) 4(100) 4(100) 1(100) 83 (65)
Sexual Gender Based Violence (SGBV) + HIV
services
18 (23) 21 (55) 3 (75) 4(100) 1(100) 47 (37)
Post abortal care + HIV services 19 (24) 30 (79) 4 (100 2 (50) 1(100) 56 (44)
Cervical cancer screening + HIV services 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (50) 1(100) 3 (2)
Adolescent SRH + HIV services 29 (37) 30 (79) 4(100) 2 (50) 1(100) 66 (52)