Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Estuaries Coast. 2020 Dec 1;43(8):2076–2091.

Table 3.

Sediment accumulation and carbon accumulation based on 210Pb modeling from sediment cores. In some cases (Portland, Nahant), sedimentation rates could be determined, but uncertainties in the model did not allow a definitive core date to be defined

Site Site code Sediment accumulation rate (g/cm2/year) Carbon accumulation rate (g C/m2/year) Core age (year)
Portland, ME PO 0.16 ± 0.09 48 ± 25 No datac
Great Bay, NH GB 1.19 ± 0.15 230 ± 30 18
Gloucester, MA NB 0.121 ± 0.008 16.7 ± 1.1 113
Nahant, MA PC 0.29 ± 0.08 20 ± 5 No datac
Boston Harbor, MA BH No dataa No dataa No dataa
Cohasset, MA CT No dataa No dataa No dataa
Orleans, MA PB 0.27 ± 0.08 8 ± 2 95
W. Falmouth, MA WF No datab No datab No datab
Prudence Island, RI PI 0.14 ± 0.02 8.9 ± 1.2 113
Martha’s Vineyard, MA MV No dataa No dataa No dataa
Charlestown, RI NP 0.26 ± 0.03 89 ± 10 54
a

Signs of disturbance/mixing in profile

b

Sediment accumulation low or negligable

c

Age could not be calculated