Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 2;9:e60299. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60299

Figure 1. Transformation of leg proprioceptive signals from sensory to central neurons.

(A) Left: Confocal image of the prothoracic (front) leg showing the location of the femoral chordotonal organ (FeCO) cell bodies and dendrites (magenta). Blue: cuticle auto-fluorescence. Right: confocal image of FeCO neurons in the fly ventral nerve cord (VNC). Blue: neuropil stain (nc82); Magenta: FeCO axons. (B) Experimental setup for two-photon calcium imaging from VNC neurons while controlling and tracking the femur-tibia joint. A steel pin was glued to the tibia, painted black, and moved via a magnet mounted on a servo motor. The tibia was vibrated by a piezoelectric crystal fixed to the magnet. Right: an example frame from a video used to track joint angle. (C–H) Calcium signals from FeCO sensory neurons or central neurons in response to swing movements of the femur-tibia joint. Top left: anatomy (magenta or green) of each cell type in the prothoracic VNC (blue: nc82). The dashed white box indicates the recording region. Bottom left: GCaMP6f fluorescence within the recording region during an example trial. The pixels comprising each region of interest are outlined. Right: changes in GCaMP6f fluorescence (ΔF/F) during femur-tibia swing movements. The thicker line is the response average (n=10, 13, 14, 4, 6, 6). (I–K) Overlay of sensory axons (magenta) and central neurons (green). Data in C–E were reproduced with permission from Mamiya et al., 2018. All VNC images were aligned using the Computational Morphometry Toolkit (Jefferis et al., 2007).

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Transformation of leg proprioceptive signals by 13Bα, 9Aα, and 10Bα cells in the fly VNC.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A–C) VNC and brain expression of the split-Gal4 lines predominantly used to label each cell type. Blue: neuropil stain (nc82), Green: GFP. (D and E) Calcium signals from 13Bα neurons during tibia swing (D, n = 5) or ramp-and-hold (E, n = 3). The thicker line shows the response average. (F) Left: 13Bα activity during vibration stimuli. Each line represents an average response from one fly to three stimulus repetitions. Right: calcium signals from 13Bα cells during a 1600 Hz, 0.9 µm amplitude vibration. The light gray box indicates when the vibration was applied, and the dark gray box indicates the window of activity averaged for the left plot. (G and H) Calcium signals from 9Aα during tibia swing (G, n = 6) or ramp-and-hold (H, n = 7). (I) Left: 9Aα activity during vibration stimuli. Right: calcium signals from 9Aα cells during a 1600 Hz, 0.9 µm amplitude vibration. (J and K) Calcium signals from 10Bα neurons during tibia swing (J, n = 4) or ramp-and-hold (K, n = 5). (L) Left: 10Bα activity during vibration stimuli. Right: calcium signals during an 800 Hz, 0.9 µm amplitude vibration.

Figure 1—video 1. In vivo calcium imaging from central neurons while manipulating the femur-tibia joint.

Download video file (7.5MB, mp4)
The video shows example recordings of calcium activity during controlled movements of the femur-tibia joint for 13Bα, 9Aα, and 10Bα neurons.