Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;47(1):54–59. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000729

TABLE 2.

Characteristics of the Azithromycin (AZM) and Control Groups Before and After Treatment for 2 Weeks

Characteristic Group Baseline After Treatment
Mean±SD P for AZM vs. Control Mean±SD Mean Change±SE P vs. Baseline P for AZM vs. Control
SPEED score (0–28) AZM 12.8±3.8 0.31 5.8±3.0 −7.0±1.1 <0.001b 0.018a
Control 11.5±2.5 8.1±2.5 −3.4±0.3 <0.001b
LLT (nm) AZM 59.4±26.3 0.34 71.0±23.5 21.3±2.6 0.028a 0.36
Control 67.6±24.4 63.5±26.9 1.8±1.9 0.005a
NIBUT (s) AZM 3.8±2.5 0.44 7.2±3.3 4.1±0.3 <0.001b 0.16
Control 4.6±3.1 5.7±3.0 0.9±0.2 0.081
Lid plugging (0–3) AZM 1.4±0.7 0.32 0.2±0.4 −1.7±0.1 <0.001b <0.001b
Control 1.7±0.7 1.0±0.6 −0.5±0.1 <0.001b
Lid vascularity (0–3) AZM 1.9±0.9 0.56 0.4±0.5 −1.3±0.1 <0.001b <0.001b
Control 2.1±0.6 2.1±0.7 0.0±0.0 1.0
Tear osmolarity (mOsm/L) AZM 331.1±17.4 0.21 309.1±18.8 −0.1±0.0 <0.001b 0.014a
Control 320.7±25.4 326.4±15.4 0.0±0.0 0.76
TBUT (s) AZM 3.8±2.5 0.23 6.0±2.8 3.3±0.4 0.001a 0.19
Control 4.7±1.8 4.8±2.2 0.9±0.2 0.81
Fluo score (0–9) AZM 1.4±1.5 0.31 0.8±1.4 −1.0±0.2 0.13 0.63
Control 0.8±1.0 0.7±1.0 0.0±0.1 1.0
Meiboscore (0–6) AZM 3.2±1.8 0.10 3.1±1.8 −0.3±0.1 1.0 0.10
Control 4.2±1.5 4.1±1.4 0.0±0.0 0.50
Meibum grade (0–3) AZM 1.4±0.7 0.15 0.4±0.5 −1.9±0.1 <0.001b <0.001b
Control 1.8±1.0 1.6±1.0 −0.6±0.1 0.16
Schirmer test value (mm) AZM 6.5±7.6 0.22 6.3±6.4 0.3±0.8 0.99 0.30
Control 12.4±11.7 10.6±10.3 1.4±0.5 0.076

P values were determined with the Mann–Whitney U test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

a

P<0.05.

b

P<0.001.

fluo score, corneal–conjunctival fluorescein staining score; LLT, lipid layer thickness; NIBUT, noninvasive break-up time of the tear film; SPEED, Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness; TBUT, fluorescein-based break-up time of the tear film.