Table 2. Summary of emerging therapy for ED: peripherally acting agents.
Compound | Type of study | Mechanism of action | Route and dosage of administration | Population studied | Main findings | Date (year) | Author |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLx-2101 | Phase IA double-blind, randomized, single dose study | New oral PDE5-I | Oral 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg | Healthy men (n=8) | SLx-2101 was well-tolerated in single doses up to 40 mg. | 2006 | Prince et al [59] |
Positive effects were shown at 0–6 h post-dose without VSS for 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg doses. | |||||||
The common side effects are headache and have been minimal. | |||||||
Vardenafil ODT | Phase I/III | PDE5-I sublingual dispersal agent | Orodispersal 10 mg | Men of broad age range with ED | Vardenafil ODT has a similar pharmacokinetic profile to vardenafil FCT. | 2011 | Heinig et al [63] |
Vardenafil ODT has significantly greater bioavailability and was well-tolerated. | |||||||
Sildenafil ODT | Phase I randomized, open-label, crossover, single-dose study | PDE5-I sublingual dispersal agent | Orodispersal 50 mg | Healthy men (n=36) | Sildenafil ODT without water, was bioequivalent to sildenafil FCT. | 2014 | Damle et al [64] |
High fat meals reduced the rate of absorption of sildenafil ODT. | |||||||
Sildenafil ODF | PDE5-I sublingual dispersal agent | Orodispersal 75 mg | Patients with ED (n=139) | Sildenafil ODF had the same safety and effectiveness of the FCT, was better appreciated by patients in overall satisfaction. | 2017 | Cocci et al [65] | |
Sildenafil ODF | Phase I | PDE5-I sublingual dispersal agent | Orodispersal equal dosage of FCT 50 mg | Psychogenic ED patients (n=20) | The serum level of ODF increased faster than those of both FCT and ODT. | 2018 | De toni et al [66] |
ODF showed a lower prevalence of headache compared to FCT and improved pattern of flushing and nasal congestion. | |||||||
Tadalafil ODF | Phase I open-label, randomized sequence, two-period, two-formulation, single-dose, crossover design | PDE5-I sublingual dispersal agent | Orodispersal equal dosage of FCT 20 mg | Healthy men (n=36) | The pharmacokinetics of the tadalafil ODF formulation was similar to those of the FCT formulation. | 2018 | Park et al [67] |
Both ODF and FCT formulations were well-tolerated. | |||||||
L-arginine | Phase II randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled comparative clinical trial | NO donors | Oral on demand for 2 wk L-arginine aspartate 8 g+AA 200 mg | ED patients (n=26) | Combination group showed the improvements in EHS and IIEF-scores compared to patients treated with placebo. | 2013 | Neuzillet et al [74] |
This drug was well-tolerated and there was no severe adverse effect. | |||||||
L-arginine | Randomized controlled trial | NO donors | Oral sildenafil 50 mg (every other day)+L-arginine 1 g (3 times daily) | Organic ED (combination=30, sildenafil=29) | Combination group improved IIEF-5 score compared to sildenafil alone group. | 2020 | El-Wakeel et al [75] |
MED2005 (GTN) | Phase II randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial | NO donors | Topical 0.2% GTN gel | ED patients (n=232) | 23% patients showed ≥4 points IIEF-EF increase after treatment vs. 14% after placebo. | 2018 | Ralph et al [78] |
The onset of erection in 70% of patient was less than 10 min. | |||||||
Adverse events were mild headaches and rhinitis. |
ED: erectile dysfunction, PDE5-I: phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, VSS: visual sexual stimulation, ODT: oro-dispersible tablets, FCT: film-coated tablets, ODF: oro-dispersal film, NO: nitric oxid, AA: adenosine monophosphate, EHS: erection hardness score, IIEF: international index of erectile function, GTN: glyceryl trinitrate, IIEF-EF: international index of erectile function-erectile function.