Table 4.
Comparative retrieval performance with and without predicting the class label (CL).
| Retrieval and data sets | F1 | APa | ARb | ACCc | |
| Without class prediction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCd | 0.844 | 0.861 | 0.828 | 0.847 |
| SZe | 0.891 | 0.892 | 0.89 | 0.89 | |
| MC + SZ | 0.88 | 0.882 | 0.878 | 0.879 | |
| MC train and SZ test | 0.534 | 0.538 | 0.53 | 0.533 | |
| SZ train and MC test | 0.729 | 0.737 | 0.72 | 0.739 | |
| With class prediction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MC | 0.929 | 0.937 | 0.921 | 0.928 |
| SZ | 0.908 | 0.909 | 0.908 | 0.908 | |
| MC + SZ | 0.9 | 0.902 | 0.898 | 0.899 | |
| MC train and SZ test | 0.795 | 0.798 | 0.793 | 0.792 | |
| SZ train and MC test | 0.811 | 0.808 | 0.813 | 0.797 | |
aAP: average precision.
bAR: average recall.
cACC: accuracy.
dMC: Montgomery County.
eSZ: Shenzhen.