Table 4.
Behavioral comparison | B | SE | z | p | Odds Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aggression by female participants (n = 4873 [alcohol] and 4868 [drugs] daily reports) | |||||
Alcohol use | −0.68 | 0.16 | 4.35 | <0.001 | 1.96 |
Past day dating violencea (ALC) | −0.56 | 0.15 | 3.65 | <0.001 | 1.75 |
Constant (ALC) | −1.31 | 0.51 | 2.59 | 0.010 | 3.72 |
Drug use | −0.67 | 0.29 | 2.30 | 0.021 | 1.95 |
Past day dating violence (DRU) | −0.53 | 0.15 | 3.40 | 0.001 | 1.69 |
Constant (DRU) | −1.25 | 0.56 | 2.24 | 0.025 | 3.51 |
Female report of male partners’ aggression (n = 4835 [alcohol]and 4890 [drugs] daily reports) | |||||
Alcohol use | −0.71 | 0.14 | 4.94 | <0.001 | 2.03 |
Past day dating violence (ALC) | −0.48 | 0.16 | 3.09 | 0.002 | 1.62 |
Constant (ALC) | −3.16 | 1.03 | 3.08 | 0.002 | 23.81 |
Drug use | −0.35 | 0.20 | 1.74 | 0.082 | 1.42 |
Past day dating violence (DRU) | −0.44 | 0.16 | 2.84 | 0.005 | 1.56 |
Constant (DRU) | −3.31 | 1.04 | 3.19 | 0.001 | 27.03 |
Note. Statistical tests for the 72 subjects’ effects are omitted. ALC = alcohol. DRU = drug.
Dating violence was measured using a modified version of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2).