Table 6.
Weekly situation | Female participants’ drinking |
Male partners’ drinkingc |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
eBACa | Bingeb | eBAC | Binge | ||
Female-initiated violent conflicts (n = 107 situations)1 | |||||
Binge drinkingb | 0.88*** | ||||
Severe aggressionb | 0.29** | 0.28** | |||
Male-initiated violent conflicts (n = 102 situations)1 | |||||
Binge drinking | 0.73*** | ||||
Severe aggression | 0.29** | 0.24** | |||
Bidirectional violent conflicts (n = 90 situations)1 | (n = 90 situations) | ||||
Binge drinking | 0.77*** | 0.80*** | |||
Severe aggression | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.07 | 0.00 | |
Female-initiated conflicts (n = 157 situations)1,2 | |||||
Binge drinking | 0.88** | ||||
Any aggression | 0.11* | 0.11* | |||
Male-initiated conflicts (n = 167 situations)1,2 | |||||
Binge drinking | 0.76*** | ||||
Any aggression | 0.28** | 0.19** | |||
Bidirectional conflicts (n = 385 situations)1,2 | (n = 385 situations) | ||||
Binge drinking | 0.70*** | 0.78*** | |||
Any aggression | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.02 | −0.01 |
Note. Binge drinking was defined as four or more drinks for women (five or more drinks for men) on a single occasion (Kanny et al., 2018). eBAC = estimated blood alcohol concentration level.
Continuous variable.
Dichotomous variable (0 = absent; 1 = present).
By women’s report.
Female participants indicated whether the conflict event (as measured by a modified version of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales [CTS2]) was initiated by themselves, their male partners, or both partners.
These situations included non-violent conflicts as well as conflicts involving dating violence.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.