Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2021 Jan 1;105(1):170–176. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003502

Table 2.

Changes in the use of lymphocyte-depleting agents and maintenance steroids during the COVID-19 pandemic

Agent Crude percentage (Unadjusted) Odds ratio (pandemic era vs. prepandemic era; adjusted as below)

Prepandemic Pandemic Model 1 (unadjusted) Model 2 (+ patient factors) Model 3 (+ center-level variation) Model 4 (sensitivity analysis)
Lymphocyte-depleting agents 73.2% 67.8% 0.720.770.82 0.650.700.74 0.400.530.69 0.400.520.69
Maintenance steroids 69.1% 69.3% 0.951.011.08 0.850.900.97 0.901.362.07 0.911.462.35

Model 1 was unadjusted. Model 2 included various recipient factors (age, race, sex, previous history of transplant, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, primary cause of end-stage renal disease, time on dialysis, serum albumin, previous history of malignancy, previous history of peripheral vascular diseases, primary insurance, hepatitis C virus, and cytomegalovirus), donor factors (deceased vs. living, age, race, sex, body mass index, serum creatinine, hepatitis C virus, cytomegalovirus; for deceased donors – donation after circulatory death, diabetes, hypertension, stroke as the cause of donor death, pulsatile perfusion, and cold ischemic time; and for living donors – biologically related donor), and HLA-A/B/DR matching. Model 3 (main analysis) also adjusted for center-level variation by including random intercepts and random slopes. Model 4 was a sensitivity analysis restricted to 172 (72.3%) transplant centers that performed more than 3 recipients during the pandemic era.