Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 8;11:606825. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.606825

TABLE 3.

Expected vs. actual classification of bacterial (n = 13) and archaeal (n = 3) sequences included in reference standard by four databases at a bootstrapping threshold of 80.

Sequence Expected Classification GTDB RDP SILVA RefSeq +RDP
1 Eubacterium ruminantium FF FF FF UE
2 Methanobrevibacter millerae EE EF EF EE
3 Methanobrevibacter olleyae EE EF EF EE
4 Peptostreptococcus anaerobius FF EE EE EE
5 Pseudobutyrivibrio ruminis EE EF EF EE
6 Propionibacterium sp. EF EF EU EE
7 Ruminococcus albus EE EE EE EE
8 Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens FF EE EE EE
9 Megasphaera elsdenii EE EF EF EF
10 Methanogenic archaeon strain ISO4-H5 Methanomassiliicoccales UU UU* UU* EE**
11 Streptococcus bovis EU EF EF EU
12 Lachnospira multipara EU EF EF EE
13 Fibrobacter succinogenes EE EE EE EE
14 Clostridium aminophilum FF UF UF EE
15 Selenomonas ruminantium EE EE EE EE
16 Prevotella ruminicola EF EE EE EE

F, database failed to assign ASV to taxonomic level. E, database assigned ASV to the expected taxonomic level. U, database assigned ASV to the unexpected taxonomic level. Both the RDP and SILVA database gave a genus, but not a species, level classification. ∗∗RefSeq + RDP database was unable to classify ASV beyond phylum.