Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;28(1):67–78. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08705-1

Table 2.

Patient characteristics

Variables (n = 47) n (%)
Age (years)
65–70 18 (38.3)
71–75 18 (38.3)
76–80 7 (14.9)
> 80 4 (8.5)
Gender
Male 31 (66)
Female 16 (34)
Nationality
Dutch 47 (100)
Housing
Independent, alone 10 (21)
Independent, with others 37 (79)
Highest level of education
Primary school 4 (9)
Secondary school 23 (49)
Secondary vocational school 11 (23)
Higher education/university 9 (19)
Current employment (yes) 5 (10.6)
Use of electronic devices at home
Smartphone and/or tablet 40 (85.1)
ASA classification
1 3 (6)
2 35 (75)
3 9 (19)
Charlson comorbidity index: median (IQR) 4 (2–6)
Tumor location
Intracavitary 37 (79)
Superficial 10 (21)
Baseline assessment (n = 46)
Frail (GFI > 4) 5 (11)
Impaired ADL (ADL ≥ 5) 0 (0)
Impaired iADL (iADL ≤ 7) 12 (26)
Mental status: anxiety (HADS-A ≥ 7) 4 (9)
Mental status: depression (HADS-D ≥ 5) 16 (35)
Risk of malnutrition (MNA-SF ≤ 11) 14 (30)
Slow-timed Up&Go (> 12 s)a 2 (5)
Low muscle strength (handgrip strength)b 7 (17)
Low subjective moderate–vigorous physical activity (SQUASH < 150 min/week)c 24 (63)

ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists, IQR interquartile range, GFI Groningen Frailty Indicator,18ADL activities of daily living,19iADL instrumental activities of daily living,20HADS-A Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale–Anxiety,24,25HADS-D Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale–Depression,24,25MNA-SF Mini Nutritional Assessment–short form21

aTimed Up&Go22 was performed by 44 patients

bHand grip strength23 was assessed in 42 patients

cSQUASH: Short QUestionnaire to ASses Health enhancing physical activity,26 assessed in 38 patients