Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 22;91(2):189–234. doi: 10.1007/s11238-020-09792-y

Table 2.

Probit regressions on the determinants of Return choices

Dep. var.: Return (0, 1) (1) (2) (3)
Restoring probability (λ)

3.022**

(1.165)

3.490**

(1.218)

3.381**

(1.272)

Recipient’s expectation (β)

5.933*

(2.459)

7.244**

(2.553)

7.754**

(2.820)

Restoring probability × recipient’s expectation

− 6.712*

(2.889)

− 8.162**

(2.965)

− 7.622*

(3.253)

Dictator expectation

1.590**

(0.586)

Recipient’s expectation > Dictator expectation

− 0.886*

(0.443)

Subject’s characteristics
Italian

− 0.559

(0.376)

− 0.506

(0.374)

Male

− 0.270

(0.231)

− 0.288

(0.218)

Experienced

0.184

(0.274)

− 0.184

(0.278)

Working student

− 0.0325

(0.123)

− 0.0789

(0.107)

_cons

− 3.345**

(1.034)

− 3.266**

(1.139)

− 3.577**

(1.101)

N 180 180 180

Results from Probit regressions are reported. The unit of observation is a dictator’s choice. Individual-level clustered robust standard errors are in parentheses. p<0.1, p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001