Table 7.
The results of the binomial logistic regression analysis with practice type, age and level of socio-economic deprivation (IMD).
| Age group | Variable | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 16 |
χ2(3) = 756.40, p < .001, R2 = .025 |
||
| b (S.E) | Exp(B) (p) | 95% CI for odds ratio (lower-upper) | |
| Practice type | 0.188 (0.037) | 1.207 (p < .001) | 1.123–1.297 |
| Age | −0.137 (0.005) | 0.872 (p < .001) | 0.863–0.881 |
| IMD | −0.064 (0.013) | 0.938 (p < .001) | 0.915–0.962 |
| 16–59 |
χ2(3) = 352.60, p < .001, R2 = .011 |
||
|
b (S.E.) |
Exp(B) |
95% CI for odds ratio (lower-upper) |
|
| Practice type | −0.111 (0.035) | 0.895 (p = .002) | 0.835–0.959 |
| Age | 0.022 (0.001) | 1.022 (p < .001) | 1.019–1.024 |
| IMD | −0.020 (0.012) | 0.980 (p = .10) | 0.958–1.004 |
| 60 and above | χ2(3) = 2597.39, p < .001, R2 = .018 |
||
|
b (S.E.) |
Exp(B) |
95% CI for odds ratio (lower-upper) |
|
| Practice type | 0.036 (0.013) | 1.037 (p = .006) | 1.011–1.064 |
| Age | 0.039 (0.001) | 1.040 (p < .001) | 1.038–1.041 |
| IMD | 0.011 (0.005) | 1.011 (p = .032) | 1.001–1.021 |