Table 3.
Major challenges facing national programmes in developing and sustaining their lymphatic filariasis MMDP activities
| Issue | Factors | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Locating patients | LF patients are often reluctant to be identified | Important to provide community-wide information about the clinical care available for LF patients |
| Estimating the number of LF cases | Diagnosis depends on only clinical signs and symptoms that are limited in specificity | There is currently no confirmatory laboratory test for LF clinical disease |
| Sustainable supply of needed materials | LF patients often cannot afford the material of access (e.g. antifungal creams) | Requires continuing donations from external agencies |
| Funding for MMDP activities | Variable international funding for specific MMDP activities | Important to maintain advocacy and positive results to funding agencies and the wider community |
| Management issues | LF programmes often focus on MDA rather than MMDP | Important to explain the need for MMDP to national programmes |
| The need for sustained MMDP | Overworked NTD programmes | Must be addressed during LF programme planning |
| Patient access to care facilities | Transport difficulties and distances from healthcare centres | Important to train local healthcare workers to support patients |
| Achieving 100% geographic coverage with MPC | This is major challenge for many countries and requires special attention as programmes move to UHC | Many countries have only managed to implement MMDP activities in small demonstration projects rather than at scale over an extended period of time |