Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 22;13(Suppl 1):S48–S54. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa080

Table 3.

Major challenges facing national programmes in developing and sustaining their lymphatic filariasis MMDP activities

Issue Factors Notes
Locating patients LF patients are often reluctant to be identified Important to provide community-wide information about the clinical care available for LF patients
Estimating the number of LF cases Diagnosis depends on only clinical signs and symptoms that are limited in specificity There is currently no confirmatory laboratory test for LF clinical disease
Sustainable supply of needed materials LF patients often cannot afford the material of access (e.g. antifungal creams) Requires continuing donations from external agencies
Funding for MMDP activities Variable international funding for specific MMDP activities Important to maintain advocacy and positive results to funding agencies and the wider community
Management issues LF programmes often focus on MDA rather than MMDP Important to explain the need for MMDP to national programmes
The need for sustained MMDP Overworked NTD programmes Must be addressed during LF programme planning
Patient access to care facilities Transport difficulties and distances from healthcare centres Important to train local healthcare workers to support patients
Achieving 100% geographic coverage with MPC This is major challenge for many countries and requires special attention as programmes move to UHC Many countries have only managed to implement MMDP activities in small demonstration projects rather than at scale over an extended period of time