Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 5;131(4):865–878. doi: 10.1002/lary.29286

TABLE II.

Pooled Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction in Different Subgroups of COVID‐19 Patients.

Subgroups of COVID‐19 Patients Olfactory Dysfunction Prevalence [95% CIs] (%) Number of Studies Analyzed Total Number of COVID‐19 Patients Heterogeneity Publication Bias, Egger's Test (P Value)
I 2 (%) P Value
Olfactory dysfunction in different regions
Europe 54.40 [46.19–62.61] 49 20,738 99 <.0001 .19
North America 51.11 [41.10–61.13] 7 1,148 87 <.0001 NA
Asia 31.39 [18.26–44.51] 22 3,477 99 <.0001 .66
Australia 10.71 [0.00–22.17] 1 28 NA NA NA
Different types of olfactory dysfunction
Anosmia 35.39 [27.73–43.04] 43 10,979 99 <.0001 .11
Hyposmia 36.15 [27.65–44.64] 24 5,200 98 <.0001 .003
Dysosmia 2.53 [0.0–6.0] 1 79 NA NA NA
Evaluation types of olfactory dysfunction
Subjective 44.53 [37.59–51.47] 73 26,229 99 <.0001 .60
Objective 72.10 [59.41–84.79] 10 1,263 97 <.0001 .33
Olfactory dysfunction based on clinical severity
Severe 9.02 [2.67–15.38] 4 687 85 .001 NA
Non‐severe 47.48 [21.34–73.62] 8 5,135 100 <.0001 NA

CIs = confidence intervals; NA = not applicable.