Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 30;128(5):908–915. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16597

Table 3.

Temporal distribution and reasons for cord clamping timing

Total (n = 403) Early cord clamping (n = 231) Delayed cord clamping (n = 172) P‐value
Per fortnight, n (%)
1–15 March 16 (4.0) 12 (5.2) 4 (2.3) 0.001
16–31 March 85 (21.1) 59 (25.5) 26 (15.1)
1–15 April 109 (27.1) 73 (31.6) 36 (20.9)
16–30 April 92 (22.8) 52 (22.5) 40 (23.3)
1–15 May 66 (16.4) 23 (10.0) 43 (25.0)
16–31 May 35 (8.7) 12 (5.2) 23 (13.4)
Reason for clamping choice, n (%)
Standard Hospital protocol 179 (44.4) 42 (18.2) 137 (79.7)
Maternal COVID‐19 disease 86 (21.3) 86 (37.2) 0 (0.0)
Neonatal resuscitation 47 (11.7) 47 (20.4) 0 (0.0)
Cesarean delivery 29 (7.2) 29 (12.6) 0 (0.0)
Preterm birth 13 (3.2) 1 (0.4) 12 (7.0)
Unknown 33 (8.2) 14 (6.1) 19 (11.1)
Others 16 (4.0) 12 (5.2) 4 (2.4)
Instrumental 3 (0.7) 3 (1.3) 0 (0.0)
Mother/Father choice 3 (0.7) 1 (0.4) 2 (1.2)
Short umbilical cord 2 (0.5) 2 (0.9) 0 (0.0)
General anaesthesia 2 (0.5) 2 (0.9) 0 (0.0)
Shoulder dystocia 1 (0.3) 1 (0.4) 0 (0.0)
Gastroschisis 1 (0.3) 1 (0.4) 0 (0.0)
Antepartum fetal death 1 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6)
Out‐of‐hospital delivery 1 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6)
Immediate neonatal evaluation 1 (0.3) 1 (0.4) 0 (0.0)
Velamentous insertion, umbilical cord rupture 1 (0.3) 1 (0.4) 0 (0.0)