2017 APHRS |
|
— |
— |
Interventional percutaneous LAA closure with the WATCHMAN device may be considered in patients with non-valvular AF who have high risk of stroke, but major contraindications to OAC therapy
Surgical excision of the LAA may be considered in patients undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery
|
2018 ACCP |
In stage IV (CrCl 15–30 mL/min) CKD, suggesting using VKAs and selected NOACs [rivaroxaban 15 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg bid, edoxaban 30 mg QD, and (in USA only) dabigatran 75 mg bid] with caution, based on pharmacokinetic data
In end-stage renal disease (CrCl < 15 mL/min or dialysis-dependent), suggesting using well-managed VKA with TTR >65–70%
|
Patients with liver function abnormalities were generally excluded from the randomized trials, and especially where there is abnormal clotting tests, such patients may be at higher risk of bleeding on VKA, possibly less so on NOACs; in cirrhotic patients, ischaemic stroke reduction may outweigh bleeding risk.
|
In patients with AF, prescription of OACs could be considered as a result of an individualized clinical assessment taking into account overall AHRE burden (in the range of hours rather than minutes) and specifically, the presence of AHRE >24 h, individual stroke risk (using CHA2DS2-VASc), predicted risk benefit of OACs and informed patient preferences (Ungraded consensus-based statement)
|
In patients with AF at high risk of ischaemic stroke who have absolute contraindications for OAC, suggesting using LAA occlusion (Weak recommendation, low quality evidence)
In AF patients at risk of ischaemic stroke undergoing cardiac surgery, we suggest surgical exclusion of the LAA for stroke prevention, but the need for long-term OAC is unchanged (Weak recommendation, low quality evidence)
|
2019 ACC/AHA/HRS |
|
– |
Prospective clinical trials of prophylactic anticoagulation based on device-detected AF are under way but have not been completed
Although increased duration of AHREs is associated with increased stroke risk, the threshold duration of AHREs that warrants anticoagulation is unclear
Current approaches factor in the duration of device-detected AF and the patient’s stroke risk profile, bleeding risk, an preferences to determine whether to initiate long-term anticoagulation
|
|
2020 ESC |
In patients with CrCl 15–29 mL/min, RCT-derived data on the effect of VKA or NOACs are lacking
The evidence for the benefits of OAC in patients with end-stage kidney disease with CrCl ≤ 15 mL/min or on dialysis is even more limited, and to some extent controversial
|
Patients with hepatic dysfunction were generally excluded from the RCTs
Despite the paucity of data, observational studies did not raise concerns regarding the use of NOACs in advanced hepatic disease
NOACs are contraindicated in patients within Child-Turcotte-Pugh C hepatic dysfunction, and rivaroxaban is not recommended for patients in the Child-Turcotte-Pugh B or C category
|
|
Class IIb - LAA occlusion may be considered for stroke prevention in patients with AF and contraindications for long-term anticoagulant treatment
Class IIb - Surgical occlusion or exclusion of the LAA may be considered for stroke prevention in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery
|