Table 4.
Authors | Country | Literature type | Focus |
---|---|---|---|
Marshall et al28 | United Kingdom | Commentary | Patient physician perspective of three cases highlighting benefits of using DIY APS and utilizing this approach in pregnancy, care of a child, and surgery |
Patton29 | Australia | Case Report | User’s experience from one year of DIY APS |
Crabtree et al8 | United Kingdom | Review | DIY APS: Principles, outcomes, and ethics |
de Bock30 | Australia | Editorial | DIY APS dilemmas facing healthcare professionals |
Waugh et al7 | United Kingdom | Editorial | Need for DIY APS research |
Barnard et al31 | International | Commentary | DIY APS overview and dilemmas |
Lewis13 | United States | Viewpoint | DIY history, pros and cons, impact |
Lee et al32 | United States | Viewpoint | Nightscout overview and regulatory dilemmas |
Lewis et al33 | United States | Letter to the Editor | Setting expectations for successful artificial pancreas/hybrid closed loop/automated insulin delivery adoption |
Lewis et al27 | United States | Letter to the Editor | Real-world use of open source artificial pancreas systems |
Lewis34 | United States | Monograph | DIY APS user’s guide |
Abbreviation: DIY APS, Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas System.