Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 21;3(12):e2030415. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30415

Table 3. Secondary Binary Outcomes at 6, 12, and 26 Weeks Postintervention.

Visit, wk FMT patients Placebo patients aOR (95% CI) P value
No. No. (%) No. No. (%)
Elevated clinic BPa 0 42 10 (24) 45 8 (18)
6 39 9 (23) 44 10 (23) 0.85 (0.27-2.65) .77
12 38 8 (21) 41 7 (17) 1.19 (0.35-4.11) .78
26 36 3 (8) 41 7 (17) 0.20 (0.03-1.14) .07
Abnormal glycaemiaa 0 41 22 (54) 44 23 (52)
6 38 20 (53) 43 19 (44) 1.32 (0.48-3.66) .59
12 37 21 (57) 40 24 (60) 0.84 (0.30-2.39) .75
26 35 24 (69) 40 28 (70) 0.92 (0.31-2.78) .88
Abnormal liver functiona 0 42 14 (33) 45 8 (18)
6 39 14 (36) 43 10 (23) 1.78 (0.65-4.89) .26
12 37 12 (32) 40 8 (20) 1.83 (0.63-5.38) .27
26 36 15 (42) 40 10 (25) 2.02 (0.73-5.57) .17
Dyslipidaemiaa 0 41 30 (73) 45 34 (76)
6 37 28 (76) 43 29 (67) 1.60 (0.56-4.53) .38
12 34 22 (65) 40 31 (78) 0.59 (0.20-1.70) .32
26 35 23 (66) 40 33 (83) 0.49 (0.16-1.50) .21
Metabolic syndromea,b 0 41 18 (44) 45 13 (29)
6 37 18 (49) 43 16 (37) 1.25 (0.43-3.65) .68
12 34 10 (29) 40 13 (33) 0.68 (0.21-2.21) .52
26 35 9 (26) 40 13 (33) 0.50 (0.15-1.66) .26

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; BP; blood pressure; FMT, fecal microbiome transfer.

a

All outcomes defined in eTable 6 in Supplement 3.

b

There was a larger reduction in prevalence of metabolic syndrome with FMT in those who had metabolic syndrome at the start of the study (see eTable 4 in Supplement 3). In the overall analyses, participants from both groups developed metabolic syndrome during the course of the study.