Table 2.
Variables | Total (n = 103) | |
---|---|---|
Emotional exhaustion | Low | 47 (45.6%) |
Moderate | 27 (26.2%) | |
High | 29 (28.2%) | |
Somatic symptom | No to minimal | 21 (20.4%) |
Low | 26 (25.2%) | |
Medium | 26 (25.2%) | |
High | 19 (18.4%) | |
Very high | 11 (10.7%) | |
Bruxism symptoms | No to minimal | 74 (71.8%) |
Medium | 22 (21.4%) | |
High | 7 (6.8%) | |
Negative Affect (PANAS) (Response modalities moderately to extremely) |
Afraid | 64 (62.2%) |
Scared | 53 (51.5%) | |
Nervous | 63 (61,2%) | |
Jittery | 48 (46,6%) | |
Guilty | 14 (13.5%) | |
Ashamed | 12 (11.6%) | |
Irritable | 50 (48.6%) | |
Hostile | 20 (19.4%) | |
Upset | 54 (52.4%) | |
Distressed | 43 (41.7%) | |
Feeling of protection by national government | Never | 19 (18.4%) |
Rarely | 37 (35.9%) | |
Sometimes | 39 (37.9%) | |
Always | 8 (7.8%) | |
Feeling of protection by regional administration | Never | 19 (18.4%) |
Rarely | 36 (35.0%) | |
Sometimes | 41 (39.8%) | |
Always | 7 (6.8%) | |
Feeling of protection by hospital agencies | Never | 22 (21.4%) |
Rarely | 25 (24.3%) | |
Sometimes | 43 (41.7%) | |
Always | 13 (12.6%) | |
Perceived adequacy of the emotional support | Yes | 52 (50.5%) |
No | 51 (49.5%) | |
Perceived usefulness of the emotional support | Yes | 66 (64.15%) |
No | 37 (35.9%) | |
Feeling of adequacy of the hygiene safety measures | Insufficient | 33 (32.0%) |
Sufficient | 50 (48.5%) | |
Highly sufficient | 20 (19.4%) |