Table 4.

Results’ summary of Brazilian e-learning systems success hypotheses tests.

Hypothesis	Independent Variable		Dependent Variable	Moderation	Findings	Conclusion Hypothesis validation
H1a	SystemQuality(SysQ)	→	Use	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = -0.020/0.012; NS	Non-significant
H1b	SystemQuality(SysQ)	→	User Satisfaction(US)	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = 0.242∗∗∗/0.237∗∗∗	Significant
H2a	InformationQuality(IQ)	→	Use	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = 0.176∗/0.241∗∗∗	Significant
H2b	InformationQuality(IQ)	→	User Satisfaction(US)	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = 0.46∗9/0.437∗∗∗	Significant
H3a	Service Quality(SerQ)	→	Use	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = -0.018/-0.007; NS	Non-significant
H3b	Service Quality(SerQ)	→	User Satisfaction(US)	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = 0.092/0.091; NS	Non-significant
H4a	Collaboration Quality(CQ)	→	Use	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = 0.366∗∗∗/0.369∗∗∗	Significant
H4b	Collaboration Quality(CQ)	→	User Satisfaction(US)	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = 0.033/-0.005; NS	Non-significant
H5a	User Satisfaction	→	Use	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = 0.136∗/n.a	Significant
H5b	Use	→	User Satisfaction(US)	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = n.a./0.102∗	Significant
H6	Use	→	NetBenefits	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = 0.259∗∗∗/0.259∗∗∗	Significant
H7	User Satisfaction	→	NetBenefits	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = 0.595∗∗∗/0.595∗∗∗	Significant
H8a	Short Term Orientation(STO)	→	Use	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = 0.023/0.024; NS	Non-significant
H8b	Use∗Short Term Orientation(STO)	→	NetBenefits	STO	$\hat{\beta }$ = -0.020/-0.020; NS	Non-significant
H8c	Short Term Orientation(LTO)	→	NetBenefits	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = -0.005/-0.006; NS	Non-significant
H9a	Long Term Orientation(LTO	→	Use	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = 0.108/0.115; NS	Non-significant
H9b	Use∗Long Term Orientation(LTO)	→	NetBenefits	LTO	$\hat{\beta }$ = -0.107∗/-0.107∗	Significant
H9c	Long Term Orientation(LTO)	→	NetBenefits	n. a.	$\hat{\beta }$ = 0.083/0.083; NS	Non-significant

Notes: n.a. = non-applicable; NS = non-significant; ∗ significant for p < 0.05; ∗∗ significant for p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ significant for p < 0.001 (Chin, 1998; Cohen, 1988).