Skip to main content
. 2020 May 17;67(6):2482–2493. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13587

Table 3.

Random‐effects logistic regression analysis of factors that influence farmer's attitude towards pigs and human movements during ASF outbreaks (*significant at p < .05)

Factor (reference level in bracket) I would stop traders from entering my farm if there is outbreak of ASF in my area (f60) I would stop veterinarians from entering my farm if there is outbreak of ASF in my area (f61) I would not sell my pig if there is outbreak of ASF in my area (f63)
Coef. (SE) p > t Coef. (SE) p > t Coef. (SE) p > t
Trained (control) 0.17(0.17) .34 −0.24(0.16) .152 −0.05(0.120) .625
Female (male) −0.39(0.13) .003* −0.12(0.17) .470 0.01(0.12) .970
District domain (Lira rural)
Lira urban 0.18(0.25) .484 −0.02(0.24) .943 −0.09(0.14) .554
Masaka rural 0.32(0.23) .166 0.77(0.23) .001* 0.20(0.14) .145
Masaka urban 0.59(0.25) .018* 1.3(0.23) .000* 0.14(0.15) .325
Not belonging to farmer group (belonging) −0.0001(0.16) .995 −0.39(0.18) .027* 0.02(0.14) .895
Primary education and lower
Education—none (primary or post‐primary) 0.39(0.13) .002* 0.46(0.15) .002* −0.23(0.11) .034*
Years in pig business 0.001(0.01) .264 0.002(0.00) .083 −0.01(0.00) .002*
Constant 0.54(0.24) .029* −1.91(0.26) .000* −0.04(0.18) .934
Village variance 0.38(0.08)   0.22(0.11)   0(0)