Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):915–924. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2479

TABLE 2.

Frequencies of the four items measuring goal setting and evaluation, means of patients' perceived lack of goal clarity, and results of the GLM univariate tests per item

Item Response options n M 95% CI F p η p 2
1. At the start of the treatment, were one or more treatment goals set? Yes 570 3.13 [3.04, 3.22]
No 171 3.91 [3.75, 4.08]
Total 741 3.31 64.92 <.001 η p 2 = .09
2. Did you set this treatment goal or these treatment goals together with your therapist? Yes 520 3.09 [3.00, 3.18]
No 50 3.68 [3.38, 3.97]
Total 570 3.13 14.14 <.001 η p 2 = .03
3. Are your treatment goal(s) discussed during the therapy sessions? Yes, at (almost) every session 165 2.83 [2.68, 2.99]
Often 184 2.91 [2.77, 3.06]
Sometimes 171 3.34 [3.19, 3.49]
(Almost) never 50 4.32 [4.04, 4.59]
Total 570 3.14 34.39 <.001 η p 2 = .17
4. Is your progress measured during the treatment? Consider the completion of questionnaire(s) or having an evaluation discussion, and so on. Yes, at (almost) every session 149 2.95 [2.77, 3.12]
Often 284 3.05 [2.92, 3.18]
Sometimes 237 3.63 [3.49, 3.76]
(Almost) never 71 4.06 [3.81, 4.32]
Total 742 3.31 28.64 <.001 η p 2 = .12

Note: The potential range of patients' perceived lack of goal clarity is from 1–7. M = estimated marginal means based on the GLM univariate tests, controlled for the number of treatment sessions patients completed so far.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GLM, general linear model; η p 2, partial eta2.