Table 3.

Pearson correlations between clinical variables, IGT performance and set‐shifting measures in the group of gamblers

Variables	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1. BIS	‐
2. G‐SAS	.041	‐
3. History	−.021	.208	‐
4. Net profit real life	.011	−.096	−.029	‐
5. Net profit IGT	−.041	−.042	−.201	.093	‐
6. Total risky decks	−.087	−.055	.119	−.099	−.431 †	‐
7. Error mixed switch	−.005	−.337	.251	.008	.109	.241	‐
8. Error mixed repeat	−.211	−.069	.341	−.035	.197	.259	.766 †	‐
9. Error single	−.106	−.086	−.314	.314	.292	−.185	.050	.255	‐

Note: Correlations between set‐shifting measures and other variables: n = 28, correlations between set‐shifting measures: n = 29, all other correlations: n = 35. BIS = Barratt impulsiveness scale; G‐SAS = Gambling symptoms assessment scale; History = history of gambling measured in years; IGT = Iowa gambling tasks.

^[†]Correlation is significant at .05 level (2‐tailed).