Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 21;7(1):e000770. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000770

Table 2.

The characteristics of included studies with a diagnostic test accuracy analysis

ID Sample size Age SA device FEV1 SA test Cut-off TP FN FP TN Sen. % Spc. % Diagnosis criteria
Li et al27
China
Cross-sectional
Asthma 561
Control 205
50.5 (18.8)* MasterLab-IOS NR R5
X35
NR 404
297
157
264
80
49
125
156
72
53
61
76
ATS guidelines
Nikkhah et al28
Iran
Cross-sectional
Asthma 87
Control 87
41.4 (15.5)
37.6 (17.8)
MasterScreen-IOS 2.2 (0.6) L
3.2 (0.9) L
R5
X5
>0.51
≤−0.2
60
36
27
51
12
8
75
79
69
41
86
91
GINA 2008
Iartsev29
Russia
Cross-sectional
1. Asthma 209
2. Asthma 75
3. Asthma 81
Control 216
1. 47.4 (0.8)
2. 47.4 (0.9)
3. (1.6)
43.8 (0.8)
Jaeger Master Screen 1. 101 (0.9)
2. 70 (0.73)
3. 53.1 (1.6)
102.6 (1.4)
MMEF all groups 90%
70%
50%
138
74
80
71
1
1
19
0
0
197
216
216
66
99
99
91
100
100
Global strategy: Joint Report of the NHLBI and WHO 1993

*For both groups.

ATS, American Thoracic Society; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FN, false negative; FP, false positive; GINA, Global Initiative for Asthma; ID, study identification (authors) country, research type; NHLBI, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; NR, not reported; SA, small airways; Sen, sensitivity; Spc, specificity; TN, true negative; TP, true positive.