Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 31;70(18):2213–2223. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.011

Table 3.

Treatment comparison of continued thienopyridine vs. placebo in randomized subjects with vs. without anatomical complexity, according to intention-to-treat analysis with subjects who had anatomic lesion complexity information available.

Event Continued Thienopyridine (N=5812) Placebo (N=5742) Hazard Ratio [95% CI] Risk Difference [95% CI] Continued Thienopyridine - Placebo Log Rank P-value P Value for Risk Difference P Value for Interaction
MI or Stent thrombosis 0.75 0.81
 Complex (N=3730) 46 (2.5%) 81 (4.5%) 0.55 [0.38, 0.79] −2.0% [−3.2%,−0.8%] 0.001
 Not Complex (N=7824) 76 (2.0%) 143 (3.8%) 0.52 [0.39, 0.69] −1.8% [−2.5%,−1.0%] <.001
MACCE 0.71 0.88
 Complex (N=3730) 85 (4.7%) 114 (6.3%) 0.72 [0.55, 0.96] −1.7% [−3.2%,−0.2%] 0.02
 Not Complex (N=7824) 157 (4.1%) 207 (5.5%) 0.74 [0.60, 0.91] −1.4% [−2.3%,−0.4%] 0.01
Bleeding (moderate/severe) 0.41 0.44
 Complex (N=3730) 40 (2.2%) 28 (1.6%) 1.41 [0.87, 2.28] 0.6% [−0.3%,1.5%] 0.16
 Not Complex (N=7824) 93 (2.5%) 52 (1.4%) 1.78 [1.27, 2.50] 1.1% [0.4%,1.7%] <.001